[Cicero]

I think that Sarah’s “lamestream” does the job pretty well.

[DakotaGator]

Sure. We can add that arrow to our quiver. Switch up and call them the Nut Wing Media or NWM every once in awhile.

I'm all for anything that gets the presstitutes frothing at the mouth.

[Lazamataz]

American Pravda Press. Communicates that their only role now is to serve as a pure propaganda outfit. I only seem to see news of merit, from England.

[Ge0ffrey]

We already have a word for them, moonbats.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

I think Limbaugh's "Drive-by Media" gets to them more than anything. It suggests exactly what they are: superficial, insubstantial -- to which I suggest including smatterers (approach superficially; dabble in) as in Media Smatters)

or my own term: Skid marks on Journalism's shorts.

[Baynative]

I would like to see someone ask media members what they hope to gain, or what their long range objective is in promoting the progressive agenda.

They should get a refresher course on how French collaborators with the Nazis were executed after Paris fell even though they had helped them along so they could have good positions in the new order. The Germans explained that if they [the collaborators] could turn against their oven people, surely they would never trust them themselves.

Someday, if there is any justice, the members of the liberal media will pay for what they are doing to the country. They will be exposed and publicized for who they are and what they are. Instead of getting trophies and red carpets they will be shamed forever and remembered in history as the scum that they are. People like Brian Ross and Dan Rather should be ridiculed, not praised. (just my opinion)

[Hardastarboard]

As long as we are rebranding the media, I think they need a nifty new symbol. In honor of their commitment to freedom, justice and tolerance, I would like to suggest that we brand them all, individually, with the hakenkreuz. That symbol worked really well for the last media organization that used it.