Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

No, Gandhi clearly wouldn’t have agreed with that position:

“…He who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully”

http://www.mkgandhi.org/nonviolence/phil8.htm


17 posted on 12/31/2013 11:11:27 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

Yet it was what Ghandi himself said.


19 posted on 12/31/2013 12:23:11 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson