Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright

According to the report of prosecutors who chose NOT to prosecute, the girl WAS drunk. You disagree with the prosecutors who are not prosecuting?

Why does expecting young men to not engage in immoral behavior seem to be a bridge too difficult to cross? They’re homosexual if they treat women with respect?

Should a team not have expectations for moral and decent behavior in their players?


12 posted on 12/07/2013 6:01:41 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

you are just wrong dude….just wrong….I saw the press conferene, the states atty said she WAS NOT DRUNK and said the tox report showed .04 - which as he said “is not very high.”

You are just flat out wrong.


13 posted on 12/07/2013 6:02:32 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

In fact, it’s the fact she CLAIMED to be too drunk to remember details - and yet was not - that probably led to the conclusions there was not much here.

And as for the idea of “expectations for moral and decent behavior” - that’s very pollyanish.


16 posted on 12/07/2013 6:06:14 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
According to the report of prosecutors who chose NOT to prosecute, the girl WAS drunk. You disagree with the prosecutors who are not prosecuting?

Depends on your standard of "drunk". At the time of the incident, her level was probably .1 or so: too high to be driving, but not so high that she would be unaware of what was going on, and thus not high enough that she could not give consent.

36 posted on 12/07/2013 6:45:42 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I heard the press conference. The prosecutor said she wasn’t drunk. Couldn’t explain the memory lapses. Memory lapses look awful in court.


38 posted on 12/07/2013 6:49:14 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

According to the AMA when a “baseline” for drunk driving was established, the medical consensus was that it took a level of 0.15ml/liter (0.15% for those in Rio Linda) for someone to be legally drunk.

Once the MADD gang and lawyers got involved, the “intoxicated” level has been forced down, repeatedly. There’s a major drop in DUI convictions, the arbitrary level is lowered, then lo and behold, a huge spike in DUI driving.

From 0.15, to 0.10, to 0.08, and now some jurisdictions are trying for 0.05, which is one third of what your local doctor thought it should be 20 years ago. A 200 pound man is playing with fire if he has 2 glasses of wine with dinner at the last level illustrated.

Follow the money, FRiend...

And there is NO way that girl was stupefied drunk. She wanted to play, and she wanted him to pay. End of story.


79 posted on 12/07/2013 11:45:21 AM PST by Don W (Know what you WANT. Know what you NEED. Know the DIFFERENCE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson