[FlJoePa]

Can you not read? Mike McQueary testified in court that he never saw a rape. That he never used the term rape. Period.

He also is on record as saying that he gave Joe a watered down version of what he THOUGHT he witnessed.

The whole “MM told Joe he saw a 10 year old boy being raped in the shower” is nothing but fiction and fantasy.

Joe did what he was supposed to do. Deal with it. The lead prosecutor agrees.

Sheesh again!

[gusty]

So you hang your hat on that McQuerry did not see Sandusky actually buggering the ten year old. That’s good enough for you. For normal men, just seeing a nude 10 year old and a nude 50 something year old in the shower engaging in “horseplay” is enough. As per Joe, any water downed version would have raised the hairs on the back of a normal real man’s neck. But not Joe. What Joe should have done was act like a real man, not the phony he truly was.

[Colofornian]

Mike McQueary testified in court that he never saw a rape. That he never used the term rape. Period. He also is on record as saying that he gave Joe a watered down version of what he THOUGHT he witnessed. The whole “MM told Joe he saw a 10 year old boy being raped in the shower” is nothing but fiction and fantasy.

Here's what I told a poster in March of this year -- after that poster tried this same Penn State tactic:

anybody who tries to parse the difference between child rape and

'fondling or doing something of a sexual nature to a young boy'

[McQueary's language contained in Grand Jury presentment, p.7...] is immorally sick to the max and should be noted as such by ALL Freepers)