If I have to pay for raising her kids, I want control of them, in state-run orphanages where they will be taught a trade as well as morals and self-control.
“If I have to pay for raising her kids, I want control of them, in state-run orphanages where they will be taught a trade as well as morals and self-control.”
I am entirely in favor of this, because this is the only way that the cycle will be broken. Many years ago, the head of the Chicago Housing Authority, and definitely not white bread from Kenilworth, suggested that all the children should be removed from the projects and sent to places in Wisconsin where they could learn to live like people. Of course, they were hammered severely for this opinion.
Furthermore, I actually believe that public humiliation should be used to dissuade people from behavior like this. I would like this person to stand up every month in front of a group of taxpayers and be given time, in a civil manner, to explain exactly why they should support her “lifestyle” and why those taxpayers and their children should do without in order to support her and their brood. No explanation - no check. Yes, it will be embarrassing. It should be, because it is.
Neil Boortz was very annoyed that great pains have been taken so that SNAP and other welfare program recipients are treated anonymously like other people buying things at the grocery. He thought that they should have certain hours late at night to shop, or go to the back of the line if the people supporting them are also in line. I think that at the very least, they should have their own lane. One lane.