No, that statue doesn’t say they clearly don’t. That statue say’s certify, and certify includes eligibility.
Go back to the hypothetical. If you’re earnest (which you’ve proven you’re not), you’ll understand why you are completely wrong and your method cannot be.
I have a 2-3 year history of being an opponent of Obama’s policies. So, whenever I’m called a shill by somebody that blindly disagrees with common sense, I declare ....
I win.
“and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. “
Exactly where in there does it say that if there are electoral votes for somebody that Congress doesn’t think is eligible they can just reject those votes?
What part of “No electoral vote...shall be rejected” don’t you understand?