Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
Okay, much better than any of your other posts. You’ve identified the problem precisely: “AND HAD THE ***POLITICAL*** votes to do so”.

It's not a real problem constitutionally, it is a problem for people who want Obama thrown out though. This is why I say the Birther movement, after having a brief moment in the sun, evaporated in that moment because people followed the breadcrumbs and realized it's a political process.

Article II - No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution ......

USCON, Article 1 section 8 4th clause: [Congress responisiblity]

To establish an [SIC] uniform Rule of Naturalization ....

So, another dead end for SCOTUS, back to Congress and the political process.

111 posted on 10/28/2013 3:23:21 PM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Usagi_yo

You dispute but do not refute.


114 posted on 10/28/2013 3:29:24 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo

What does establishing a uniform rule of naturalization have to do with determining Presidential eligibility? Are you saying Obama is an ILLEGAL alien? If naturalization applies to him at all, then he DOESN’T qualify as being a natural born citizen.

You are losing it.


115 posted on 10/28/2013 3:31:17 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson