Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SNOPES
Email | 10/10/2013 | Self

Posted on 10/10/2013 10:58:07 AM PDT by dvan

Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites.

Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.

Shades of Krystalnacht

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'? We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!

Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.

I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:

Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.

Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.

Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out! Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.

It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?

Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!

Check out these examples:http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790..htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bho44; bumblehumper; kagan; liberalmedia; naturalborncitizen; obama; snopes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-109 next last
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete. However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!

There truly is tyranny afoot

1 posted on 10/10/2013 10:58:07 AM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dvan

Actually this has been known for sometime. She has needed to recuse herself from several cases but has not.


2 posted on 10/10/2013 11:07:07 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

” Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets.”

Actually that is NOT what Snopes said. It said the dockets existed but did not pertain to his ‘eligibility’ issue as stated in the email. One needs to research each docket to verify this.


3 posted on 10/10/2013 11:08:47 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Can the Chief Justice force her to recuse herself?


4 posted on 10/10/2013 11:09:26 AM PDT by wordsofearnest (Proper aim of giving is to put the recipient in a state where he no longer needs it. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

That’s correct. None of those was an eligibility case.


5 posted on 10/10/2013 11:10:11 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wordsofearnest

That I don’t know but I wouldn’t count on Roberts to be honest. Seems to me Roberts kids were threatened because they weren’t adopted from where Roberts stated they were. That was on FR awhile back.


6 posted on 10/10/2013 11:13:01 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dvan
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.

You know of a way to delete threads on Free Republic?

7 posted on 10/10/2013 11:13:59 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
So where you gona go to find the truth?
8 posted on 10/10/2013 11:14:07 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
You have been a member since 2000. Where have you been all this time?

Most of us have read and known about Elana Kagan defending Barack Obama for some time now.

9 posted on 10/10/2013 11:15:12 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
I've wondered for years who died and appointed Snopes a deity. I treat Snopes like anything else on the Internet and anyone that hides their agenda already has some honesty issues.
10 posted on 10/10/2013 11:17:51 AM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

NEVER, NEVER trust snopes as the definitive source.


11 posted on 10/10/2013 11:19:15 AM PDT by rktman (Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dvan
Uh, even WND backtracked from the claim you are making.

http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/187797/

"Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described a series of cases for which Elena Kagan represented the government as eligibility cases. Those cases, in fact, were a series of unrelated disputes pending before the Supreme Court and the references have been removed from this report."

Look, I get it that Obama is bad. He has passed Klintoon, LBJ and Carter as the worst President in our history. There are a host of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama.

However, one of the main weapons that the left has in its arsenal is ridicule. They have succeeded in using ridicule to help capture an entire generation of young people. Posting stuff like this only makes the job of the left easier.

12 posted on 10/10/2013 11:20:07 AM PDT by JohnGerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Snopes is run by an extreme left-wing man/woman team that are fanatic Obama supporters and have been caught in one lie after another.


13 posted on 10/10/2013 11:24:55 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wordsofearnest

No, but Congress can. Congress can Censor and impeach federal judges. Censor is probably best option, it just means her vote doesn’t count either side.


14 posted on 10/10/2013 11:25:29 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wordsofearnest

No. None of the Justices have that kind of power over the other Justices.

The only remedy is impeachment by Congress.


15 posted on 10/10/2013 11:25:58 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Snopes is good for debunking “kidney removal in the bathtub” stories,

but nothing even remotely political.


16 posted on 10/10/2013 11:27:15 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

That was tried once, and they couldn’t even remove a blatant drunkard from the bench

and wasn’t tried again since.


17 posted on 10/10/2013 11:28:07 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
I think you mean censure, and no, Congress has no authority to censure the Supreme Court justices. It's impeachment or nothing.
18 posted on 10/10/2013 11:28:31 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Now, now, don’t discourage the youngsters, with young skulls full of mush. Many of them who have not had a clue, are just now tuning in. Lets hope to bring them along in a hurry.

I’m razzing you. Old news is new news to so many. The following comes to mind, naturally.

“Those who fail to remember history are condemned to repeat it.”

%:D


19 posted on 10/10/2013 11:28:45 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnGerald; dvan
The ONLY thing wrong with the email is that Kagan defended Obama in eligibility cases. That's incorrect. However there is a wealth of information on Kagan defending Obamas positions.

Elena Kagan: The ObamaCare Recusal That Wasn't

There are many more articles about her need to and refusal to recuse herself.

20 posted on 10/10/2013 11:30:11 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

bttt


21 posted on 10/10/2013 11:34:37 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dvan

If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.

*************

The question maybe should be....

Are you interested in justice or in truth?


22 posted on 10/10/2013 11:36:32 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

SNOPES is not reliable.


23 posted on 10/10/2013 11:46:06 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Coffee!
(Or us that coughee?)


24 posted on 10/10/2013 11:59:54 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Tick off a Mod?


25 posted on 10/10/2013 12:07:30 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dvan

snopes is a bogus leftist site that lies. The couple that own it are communists.


26 posted on 10/10/2013 12:29:54 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
You know of a way to delete threads on Free Republic?

 

 

Yes. Just like this....

 

 
THREAD humblegunner DOES NOT LIKE
Since Jan 23, 2001
 

view home page, enter name:
  This THREAD has been banned or suspended.
  Okay

 

 

 

 

 

 

27 posted on 10/10/2013 12:32:59 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

That trick NEVER works.


28 posted on 10/10/2013 12:36:31 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I guess not. The damn thread is still here.

And so are you.

(sarc tag or no sarc tag. Can’t decide...)


29 posted on 10/10/2013 12:38:09 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Snopes is run by an extreme left-wing man/woman team that are fanatic Obama supporters and have been caught in one lie after another.

So what is the registered political affiliation of this man and woman?

30 posted on 10/10/2013 12:49:39 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

And if you find an answer to my prior question, please post a link to the site........thanks


31 posted on 10/10/2013 12:51:24 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Seems to me Roberts kids were threatened because they weren’t adopted from where Roberts stated they were. That was on FR awhile back.

Then maybe you can search it out for us and post a link to the discussion.

32 posted on 10/10/2013 12:52:55 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
SNOPES is not reliable.

According to who? And does that "who" profess to have more reliable information?

33 posted on 10/10/2013 12:55:12 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
snopes is a bogus leftist site that lies. The couple that own it are communists.

So now they're communists? Care to cite YOUR sources?

34 posted on 10/10/2013 12:58:58 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dvan

What? We can afford to pay the Supreme Court?


35 posted on 10/10/2013 1:00:00 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Snopes' Liberal Agenda - Not the Ultimate Source of Truth

Snopes.com changes hospital of Obama's birth 90 minutes after WND.COM article but has no..evidence

Then maybe you can search it out for us and post a link to the discussion.

I've already done some of YOUR research. You want to challenge someone, YOU research it.

36 posted on 10/10/2013 1:04:16 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
"I’m razzing you."

:-)

"Old news is new news to so many."

How true that is.

37 posted on 10/10/2013 1:09:32 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco; LibLieSlayer
You come stomping in the thread calling everyone liars with no proof. Not a good move. Snopes has a leftist, anti-religion agenda that a blind man can see.

If you think that you have proof otherwise, post it.

38 posted on 10/10/2013 1:10:39 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Thanks for posting the truth DJ MacWoW. Snopes, Wikipedia and Google form a trio of evil on the 'net. It's always best to consult Free Republic to get an honest answer. After all, it was here that Dan Rather's lies were uncovered, ultimately leading to his firing. As I recall, it was also Free Republic that first broke the news about Governor Sarah Palin getting selected as the VP pick.

The lamestream media (both of the dinosaur breed and the new media) are run by evil leftists. Their currently is falsehood and they use those lies to push an anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-gun homosexual agenda.

39 posted on 10/10/2013 1:15:00 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex
Thanks.

A lot of the net is controlled by the left. FR is a bastion and we're lucky that we have our own servers.

40 posted on 10/10/2013 1:19:17 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule the all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Good afternoon.

Actually this has been known for sometime. She has needed to recuse herself from several cases but has not.

Correct, especially 0bamacare. Roberts should have made a comment regarding recusal, but no...Roberts, hmmm, (being civil...),I won't go into his so called "opinion," or him possibly being compromised [how did Nazi Pelosi know before hand?).

5.56mm

41 posted on 10/10/2013 1:20:52 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Has anyone asked snopes if snope is reliable, snoping snopes, and is there any way anyone with that much power would be able to be objective?


42 posted on 10/10/2013 1:21:44 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1456856/posts?


43 posted on 10/10/2013 1:23:15 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

Well a little blackmail always works.


44 posted on 10/10/2013 1:31:57 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule the all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You come stomping in the thread calling everyone liars with no proof.

Hey BowWow, who is the REAL liar here? I never made any such accusation, all I did was ask for sources to all the accusations made against SNOPES.......

So why is that a problem for you?

45 posted on 10/10/2013 1:32:03 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Well what have we here? A Trew Blewer? Hm?


46 posted on 10/10/2013 1:36:32 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule the all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; Jim Robinson; onyx; ShadowAce; JRandomFreeper; rbd3
FR is a bastion and we're lucky that we have our own servers.

That it is but I am somewhat worried (hopefully I'm wrong) about the web server engine that underlies Free Republic. It's called NGINX and is a Russian-based software project. Here's their logo, complete the red star and other symbols of the Cold War and the Soviet era:

I realize that Russia is now better than it was a few ago with Putin standing up against the sodomites but I still have a measure of distrust for that country. I've pinged some of the tech experts here, as well as Jim, to possibly allay my fears of a backdoor planted by the Russians in NGINX. They used to use Apache for web services which is based in Maryland. The change was made a few months back IIRC.

47 posted on 10/10/2013 1:38:30 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: deport; DJ MacWoW
Seems to me Roberts kids were threatened because they weren’t adopted from where Roberts stated they were.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1456856/posts?

From the Drudge article posted, I don't see any threat at all.....political BS, sure, but no threat.

48 posted on 10/10/2013 1:40:31 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Ms. Muffett suffered from arachnophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dvan
They deny that they are funded by Soros. They deny receiving any funds (apart from advertising revenues) from "any sponsor, investor, partner, political party, religious group, business organization, government agency, or any other outside group or organization."

It is a little frustrating, though. David may be a registered independent, and Barbara may be a Canadian citizen who can't register with any party but that doesn't mean that they don't have biases. Biases that come out not so much in the things they fight for, but in what they take for granted and what they dismiss as not worth discussing.

FactCheck.org's vouching for Snopes isn't very convincing, as the two groups probably share most of the same assumptions and prejudices (I don't see that Soros funds FactCheck.org, either. They have enough foundation money. Soros did fund the shortlived factcheck.com, though).

49 posted on 10/10/2013 1:41:34 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Defending Snopes are we?
Yes, leftists follow the communist line.
Snopes are worshippers of Obama.
They are leftists.

That has been discussed at length here on FR.


50 posted on 10/10/2013 1:42:17 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson