[DakotaGator]

Some years back Popular Science's then new editor proudly announced in the magazine how it, meaning they, would immediately become proponents of scientific political “issues”. That issue of the magazine had numerous articles embracing Global Warming.

With Popular Science publicly drinking the Global Warming koolaid I, in turn, immediately canceled my subscription with comments to the effect that it no longer could legitimately justify including “Science” in its name.

Am not surprised that it can no longer tolerate reasoned comments.

[publius911]

Some years back Popular Science's then new editor proudly announced in the magazine how it, meaning they, would immediately become proponents of scientific political “issues”.

I am surprised it is still a viable publication.
I did not keep track, but I stopped reading Popular Science about the same time, probably for the same reason in the same issue.

Militant advocacy of "scientific political issues" and actual science is an oxymoron.