Posted on 09/24/2013 5:50:22 AM PDT by impimp
Who would you blame for a government shutdown?
I am sick of this question being asked and it causes a barf alert in me. It skews surveys because of course I would "blame" the GOP. Except "blame" isn't the word to use. It should be "credit".
Who would you credit for a government shutdown?
president Barry
senate democrats
senate republicrats
house democrats
house republicrats
other so-called progressives
In that order.
Bozo and his minions...
All of them actually with the exception of 2 Tea Party patriots!
There was a poll yesterday from some “news organ” in MN that didn’t even give the option of the Democrats.
Blame? Maybe their shutting up eer I mean down would be a good thing for this country.
I blame the slow motion cultural collision of the forces of fascism on the left and the forces of freedom on the right. ‘twas ever thus except, for a few decades, the forces of freedom prevailed here but, at least since Wilson, the fascists are in the ascendency. We have, right in front of us, the fight of the centuries. If the left wins, we will descend back to feudalism where every man owes nearly everything to a chain of illegitimate authorities above him and freedom ceases to exist.
Shutting down the government is a first step. CWII will likely follow and posterity depends on who wins. I’ve backed up all I’m going to.
Answer: all of the above.
That's it for the flip answer. But let's look a little deeper into the situation. The Republicans have sent a bill that continues funding most of government to the Senate. The only spending missing is the funds for the so-called Obamacare program. In other words, it's a bill that would maintain the full faith and credit of the government to the vast majority of existing recipients of money from the US Treasury. The Senate passing this bill would prevent a shutdown of the US government for sure.
Then the Democrats can then work to craft and pass a separate bill, starting in the House as required by the Constitution, to fund Obamacare. Nothing in the Continuing Resolution passed in the house precludes the Democrats from pushing for the funding of their pet. Now, the politics of the matter is that any such bill would also end up including reforms to Obamacare, including those identified by the Democrats as "glitches". This would also be a chance for the Democrats to heal another part of the bill: put reasonable limits on medical liability claims, shut down the deep-pockets litigation scheme, and reduce medical costs across the board by making "preventative medicine" unnecessary. (That would have shaved a good $20K out-of-pocket from my last major hospital stay.)
If it's so good for the country, why are the Democrats so afraid of going that route?
The question itself is an example of how the news media is skewed to the Progressive left.
The government is inherently good, and more government is inherently better, and more funding for government activity is inherently good. Or, to put it better, all these things are understood and go without saying.
It is understood that all societal problems have sources in insufficient government activity and solutions in greater government activity.
Ergo, for example, there can only be “blame” for a government shutdown. It goes without saying that there can be no praise or credit for any cutting of government.
Government Shutdown?
It is Time to DownSize DC. Not just cut it, close entire Rogue Fed Gov Departments.
Gut & Field Dress it.
Obama WILL bow to Islamists and Communists, however.
This administration sees domestic political opponents as a greater THREAT than he does those who seek to see us crippled or conquered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.