There was no challenge. There was only a polemic.
Which of the questions were you able to answer clearly, logically, and reasonably?
Really? No challenge? I guess you did not read section 3. There are plenty of challenges there.
And why would you dismiss it as “polemic”? Of course it is polemic - see definition following.
Definition of polemic:
1.passionate argument: a passionate, strongly worded, and often controversial argument against or, less often, in favor of somebody or something
2.passionate critic: somebody who engages in a passionate dispute about or argues passionately against somebody or something
3.containing passionate argument: containing or expressing passionate and strongly worded argument against or in favor of somebody or something
To dismiss it as “polemic” only exposes an inability or unwillingness to answer the questions, does it not?