Halos fan here, but a team playing in Disneyland's hometown calling themselves the "Los Angeles" Angels is...well...goofy.
1 posted on
09/03/2013 7:14:45 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
the should rename themselves, “the identity crisis angels of anahole”.
2 posted on
09/03/2013 7:18:31 AM PDT by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: BenLurkin
I agree. It’s goofy already, though, with their current name...IMO, they need to pick one of the other. Either LA Angels and Anaheim Angels (or back to California Angels). The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim is one of the silliest names I recall.
I suppose if the New York Giants and NY Jets can play in New Jersey, the LA Angels can play in Anaheim, right??
3 posted on
09/03/2013 7:18:33 AM PDT by
ilgipper
(Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
To: BenLurkin
I imagine it won’t be long before the atheists demand that they drop the “Angels” part too.
4 posted on
09/03/2013 7:18:49 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(The time for impeachment has come.)
To: BenLurkin
Based on their lack of success this year, why tarnish Anaheim's good name with the Angels?
Orange county angels-still too close
How about Earth Angels?
Disgruntled fan.
6 posted on
09/03/2013 7:22:32 AM PDT by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington)
To: BenLurkin
Halos fan here, but a team playing in Disneyland's hometown calling themselves the "Los Angeles" Angels is...well...goofy. I just want to know why they're not called "Disney's Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim."
7 posted on
09/03/2013 7:23:25 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
(Just a common, ordinary, simple savior of America's destiny.)
To: BenLurkin
Why is it that the world never remembered the name of Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfern- schplenden- schlitter- crasscrenbon- fried- digger- dingle- dangle- dongle- dungle- burstein- von- knacker- thrasher- apple- banger- horowitz- ticolensic- grander- knotty- spelltinkle- grandlich- grumblemeyer- spelterwasser- kurstlich- himbleeisen- bahnwagen- gutenabend- bitte- ein- nürnburger- bratwustle- gerspurten- mitz- weimache- luber- hundsfut- gumberaber- shönedanker- kalbsfleisch- mittler- aucher von Hautkopft of Anaheim?
8 posted on
09/03/2013 7:28:10 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(21st century. I'm not a fan.)
To: BenLurkin
The Pitcherless Angels of Anaheim has a certain ring to it.
9 posted on
09/03/2013 7:32:21 AM PDT by
Yogafist
To: BenLurkin
10 posted on
09/03/2013 7:45:37 AM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(0bama lied, Stevens died, now 0bama covers up the lies.)
To: BenLurkin
Maybe they would be better served by spending their time developing a pitching staff and not overpaying for free agents instead of worrying about their name...again.
13 posted on
09/03/2013 8:17:03 AM PDT by
fungoking
(Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
To: BenLurkin
Played As:
1961-1964 -> Los Angeles Angels
1965-1996 -> California Angels
1997-2004 -> Anaheim Angels
2005-Today-> Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
I prefer 'California Angels' myself.
14 posted on
09/03/2013 8:20:09 AM PDT by
DigitalVideoDude
(It's amazing what you can accomplish when you don't care who gets the credit. -Ronald Reagan)
To: BenLurkin
Maybe Los Angeles should just sell naming rights to the city to Microsoft or Toshiba and be done with it.
To: BenLurkin
The were the first MLB team in SoCal...
SoCal Angels?
Hey, they’re the hottest team in baseball right now, so Arte can do whatever he wants.
18 posted on
09/03/2013 8:47:21 AM PDT by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
To: BenLurkin
Adding “Los Angeles” to the team name was a ploy to get Westside, South Bay, and San Fernando Valley people to come to or watch Angel games. IMHO it doesn't work.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson