Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

The military made a conscious decision, under the civilians in control, to NOT expand the Army much. Expanding it enough to handle the demand would have required money, and it would have signaled that we would be there a long time.

During my tour in Afghanistan at 49 (in 2007), I was serving with guys who were on their third & fourth rotation. That was obscene. But GWB didn’t want America to be disturbed from its comfortable lifestyle...


28 posted on 08/25/2013 3:55:07 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

Your explanation helps me to make a little more sense of those times. What you say has an unfortunate sort of logic, if you take the Rove/ Rumsfeld perspective. I guess style ruled over once substance again, just like last November.


32 posted on 08/25/2013 4:02:17 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Military.com
“Contrary to popular belief, recruiting offices didn’t fill up after 9/11 like they did after the attack on Pearl Harbor. A modest rise in enlistments followed 9/11, but that increase quickly dissipated as the nation got caught up in two grinding wars.
By 2006, the services were missing recruiting goals. They began lowering standards and offering enlistment bonuses to draw volunteers. In 2003, 94 percent of Army active-duty recruits had high school degrees. Four years later that number had fallen to 82 percent, according to the Army Recruiting Command.”


39 posted on 08/25/2013 4:18:16 PM PDT by ansel12 (Obama-[obamacare] "used to be a Republican idea. ThereÂ’s a governor of Massachusetts who set it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson