I am talking about two words, in Hebrew and Arabic, that have essentially identical meanings.
As I said, you are perfectly free to decide the person Muslims actually worship is really a demon. But you are not free to claim that since the Hebrew Bible does not use a word in a language that did not exist at the time, it “proves” something about Jewish/Muslim comparative claims to the Holy Mount.
IOW, while I agree with the author’s conclusions, some of his arguments are illogical or irrelevant.
Sorry, I am free to state what I wish and that is your are wrong.
You apparently have no historical context and are driven by some logic known only to you to make allah and God the same.
You are free to ignore me.
When Mohamed cleared the edifice of idols, he declared that the one true name of god was his father's god, allah.
Since this occurred in the 7th century, and Jerusalem, nor the Temple Mounts is mentioned anywhere in the Koran, I would say that the Jewish Temple site is in Jerusalem.
The important point is that whenever Islam physically invades a country, the first act is to occupy and change the original population's worship sites to mosques. What will happen to Norte Dame Cathedal once the muslims have their was.
In the past if you were a Christian or Jew, you had the choice of submission, without conversion. All others had the choice of conversion or death. Which would you choose?
Since the Shiite and Sunni believe we are in the last days, they now give no choice, but murder anyone they consider an infidel. The aim of Islam is not a religious one, it is a goal of conquest, and has always been a goal of conquest for the moon god allah.