The tolerance of the left...
Why do the homos insist on going where they are not wanted?
If they’re anything like my militant lesbian cousin, the couple went looking for a place that wouldn’t do business with them.
Tell the miscreants to Luck themselves.
Even you.
I bet they wouldn’t rent their facility for a Satanic seance either. I know I wouldn’t.
I've read the Iowa and the United States Constitutions many times, and nowhere is the judiciary granted law-making or constitution-amending authority.
This is a coup d'etat, enabled by the ignorant cowards in the executive and legislative branches.
the left enjoy shoving things down others’ throats, both figuratively and literally
Being black isn’t a sin. Being a sodomite is. The state is now effectively forcing people to violate their conscience because a couple of fudgepacking libtards couldn’t be bothered to find one of probably dozens of other businesses that would’ve celebrated their sin with them.
This country is going to hell.
The way out is simple: Rent them the newly decorated hall featuring very prominent banners with bible quotes.
Quotes about forgiveness, certain types of sin, hell, Jesus can forgive anything, contact information about ex-gay Christian groups, etc.
racist? you mean you can change your race by going in the out door??
if these people do not have the right to choose who, when and where they perform their business... they are no more then slaves
it’s their right to choose
anyone attacking them for it is attempting to deny their rights
IMO, their goal is to be able to force churches to allow the ceremonies be performed and celebrations (receptions) to be held on church property. The state has no right to force a business to go against its conscience.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
What say the churches in the area? With whom do they side?
If they are silent, why?
A part of their problem with the state is the following imo. The Odgaards evidently don’t know their constitutional protections well enough to get pro-gay rights activists off of their backs.
More specifically, not only did the Founding States protect religious expression as evidenced by the 1st Amendment, but the states have never amended the Constitution to protect so-called gay rights.
So what we have in this case is 14th Amendment infringement by a state, evidenced by some state law which is going too far in abridging the Odgaard’s 1st Amendment protected freedom of religious expression.
IMHO, it is not the government's job to force anyone to take anyone else's business.
In cases like this how far can the gays force so called tolerance~~~only as far as the folks will let them! Maybe time to rethink all this “tolerance” cr@p~~~just saying~