To: marktwain
This is old news. The US Supreme Court ruled back in the 80's that police have no responsibility to protect you.
Warren v District of Columbia
I couldn't find a shorter summary.
To: <1/1,000,000th%
"The US Supreme Court ruled back in the 80's that police have no responsibility to protect you." Then how come if an LEO orders me to assist him and I don't I can be charged and prosecuted?
38 posted on
08/03/2013 7:33:01 AM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: <1/1,000,000th%
59 posted on
08/03/2013 9:47:30 AM PDT by
Oatka
(This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
To: <1/1,000,000th%
The Warren opinion is an excellent round up and summary but it is not by the U.S. Supreme Court; it is by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, which is the municipal court of D.C. It had a significant dissent.
76 posted on
08/03/2013 4:54:13 PM PDT by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson