Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EinNYC

Turned it off as soon as he started into his ranting spcculations based on zero evidence and, such as in the case of the continual policeman wannabe comments, made in ignorance of the evidence brought out at the trial. Zimmerman applied to the police force and was turned down because of his financial situation. Given the chance to try again he chose not to do so. Further, Zimmerman, when offered a position where he could wear a uniform and ride in patrol cars as an auxilary he turned that down. Apparently he did not want to be a policeman so much that he was willing to persist or take a position that could enable him to work into the force when it was offered to him.

Michael Savage’s dealing with this case has been an illustration of utter ignorance accompanied by self delusional patting himself on his back for his supposed briliance. His habitual diatribes against lawyers seem to have blinded him toward being able to correclty analyse the legal process at work or learn enough about it to make accurate observations.


11 posted on 07/11/2013 9:55:18 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanVictory
Re: “Wannabe Policeman”

I thought Zimm’s defense team passed up a great opportunity.

Every time a cop testified, they should have asked, “At any point in your life were you a Wannabe Policeman?”

27 posted on 07/12/2013 12:27:20 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson