Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

PET scans are this way.


5 posted on 07/08/2013 6:13:55 PM PDT by arichtaxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arichtaxpayer
PET scans are this way.

Yes, my husband had a number of PET scans. They are much more expensive than MRIs. Organs that normally have high sugar content can't be assessed to have cancer by a PET scan. The kidneys, for instance, will light up whether or not there is cancer there due to the usual sugar that is in the kidneys. When we would see the PET scans, organs normally with sugar were always lit up.

14 posted on 07/08/2013 6:48:11 PM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: arichtaxpayer

I was going to say the same-how would this be different than a PET scan? Other than PET scans use radioactive materials—there’s probably more overhead with handling.


21 posted on 07/08/2013 7:18:46 PM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: arichtaxpayer
PET scans are this way.

PET scans use labeled 2-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose and expose you to ionizing radiation.

36 posted on 07/08/2013 10:25:47 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson