Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden
That was a simplistic answer born of lack of understanding.

Not really. Destroying mills and foundries is a setback.

But taking Pittsburgh would not have meant an end to the Union's supplies of iron ore, or coking coal or water.

There were large foundries in Massachusetts, not as well-located as Pittsburgh, but still productive.

Pittsburgh's greatest advantage was Rodman's patented process which gave it a technological edge. That edge was transferable in an emergency.

I'm not sure how well you understand Pittsburgh's role in all this - it was not a magical place. It had great advantages which made it a very economical area to forge iron and therefore a place that attracted engineering talent.

29 posted on 07/08/2013 8:37:19 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
"I'm not sure how well you understand Pittsburgh's role in all this - it was not a magical place."

It made 90% of the Unions cannons and shells. That's just a fact, nothing magical about it. Replacing that in 1863 is not as easy as you seem to think.
31 posted on 07/08/2013 9:09:06 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson