Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What To Do If You're Pulled Over And Arrested For DUI
DUIanswer.com ^ | Unknown | Unknown

Posted on 06/20/2013 3:18:55 PM PDT by kreitzer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: Tammy8; elkfersupper

“Hubby hit a cow and wrecked our truck recently, officers on the scene wanted him to take a field sobriety test but he explained to them that he had a stroke a few years ago and his slight impairment would likely cause him to fail the test. He offered to do a breath test and he did, had not been drinking. He said the officers were very professional and did not question his not wanting to do the field sobriety, guess they had common sense.”

What was the legal consequences that the court imposed upon your husband? I suspect that there were none, but wanted to confirm. Until then, let’s take a look at the facts as you have presented them:

1. Your husband is an impaired driver every time he drives.
2. Your husband caused property damage that impacted someone’s livelihood.
3. The situation and result did not involve alcohol.
4. The result was worse than what most DUI arrested drivers have caused to others.

I am not an advocate of allowing impaired driving, however I am an advocate of taking appropriate punitive action against any driver that causes property or personal damage to any other party.

I had a friend killed on his morning commute to work by a lady that was texting and rear ended him at a speed of 45-60 mph. She never spent a day in jail. I also have a friend that received a DUI and spent 90 days in jail, he had never caused another person any property damage or bodily harm.

This clear difference has trained society to consider driving after consuming ANY alcohol to be very dangerous, and it can be. However, it has also made people think that other wreckless actions are not dangerous when driving.

While this situation has done much in the area of revenue collection, it has actually made the roads more dangerous.


81 posted on 06/21/2013 8:40:37 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

“For whatever reason you’re stopped, if at night, turn on the interior lights in an attempt to further defuse the situation.”

Actually, the opposit is true. I never would have thought it, but I just spoke with a police officer about it and he said that you should leave your interior lights off. It allows their flash lights to be more effective...I suppose that after their approach to your car, then turning them on would be helpful.

(No, I wasn’t pulled over, this conversation occured in a civilian setting. ;-)


82 posted on 06/21/2013 8:50:50 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Triple

What about keeping a small bottle of liquor under the front seat and drinking it in front of the cop after he pulls you over?
******************************************
I read a news story years back (think it was from New York) where someone was in an accident ... ran to a nearby liquor store and consumed mass quantities ... they couldn’t charge him despite an elevated BAC because it couldn’t be proven that the alcohol was there before the accident and of course he had the receipt and witnesses showing consumption afterwards... I think he also had the good sense to NOT return to the (undrivable) car as just sitting in it would have re-opened the timeline for alcohol and being in the car.


83 posted on 06/21/2013 8:51:45 AM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

DUI stands for driving under the influence. Here, it used to be DWI, driving while intoxicated. I just wonder, how many more people are driving under the influence of narcotics (prescribed or not), or otherwise driving impaired? What tests have you ever heard being used for these people.

I’ll answer my own question. Pretty much none. So, let’s demonize drinkers, and let Mrs Jones, who’s driving around with 3 lortabs, or her daily dose of “nerve pills” drive around with no consequences.


84 posted on 06/21/2013 8:56:27 AM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Hubby is not an impaired driver, he is an impaired walker- he walks normally but cannot do the heel toe thing, or one foot at a time type thing- between being blown up and having a slight stroke his balance is not 100%. He is good to go on the rest. He was not charged with anything. Our insurance paid for the cow. People hit cows on the roads here at night all the time- we still have open range areas, hubby has only hit one in his lifetime so I don’t see him as a driving risk or a huge risk to cows. In fact hubby has only been in three wrecks- one a deputy sheriff ran a red light (not in pursuit) t-boned hubby, then about 10 years later hubby hit a deer- then recently the cow. Good you are concerned with property damage- when our livestock is killed on the road the driver usually flees and we don’t get paid but we would not do that to anyone else. You sure do assume a lot...


85 posted on 06/21/2013 9:29:13 AM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

You posted: “he explained to them that he had a stroke a few years ago and his slight impairment would likely cause him to fail the test.”

It isn’t much of an assumption to link driving capability to your statement regarding impairement. In addition, you skipped over the point of my post. Your husband still did more than the vast majority of DUI arrests, yet there was no court involvement at all (it sounds like none was necessary as you made the owner of the cow whole.)

As a society we find it acceptable to not jail folks that cause property damage (your hubby) or others that actually kill people (my friend as one example) so long as those drivers had not consumed alcohol. Yet, we also find it acceptable to continue to increase the penalties and jail time requirements for others that never caused property damage or bodily harm to others.

This dicotomy has created a more dangerous driving situation. While I think your husbands situation may be entirely proper and that the driver that killed my friend should certainly be imprisoned for a very long time, I am wondering, how is the result of their situations somehow LESS damaging now than if they had been consuming alcohol?

I would prefer that all negligent drivers be treated equally, regardless of alcohol consumption. One could make the property owners’ whole, as you have done, or one could face long term prison sentences if their driving negligence causes the death of someone. It should not be that one can cause no harm, but because of some politically popular number be imprisoned while others cause harm and have much less repercussions.

While some FReepers celebrate....


86 posted on 06/21/2013 9:51:58 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: saleman

That change from DWI to DUI just threw the barn door open to the possibilities of being charged... laws used to mean something ,, now everything is an open ended fishing expedition ,, and of course by leaving everything so loose it makes defending near impossible and incredible expensive.


87 posted on 06/21/2013 9:59:50 AM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
"Before doing so, you should ask him if you are under arrest."

Roger that. An attorney buddy shared his DUI checklist with me years ago. That step was on the list.

88 posted on 06/21/2013 10:26:18 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I have never been a fan of the draconian laws of DUI, they have no common sense and do not do what they claim. The repeat DUI offender, absolute alcoholic that is going to drive no matter what- still does... Many people that are not impaired but may be close or a spec over legal on the breath test after one or two drinks often have their lives ruined.

You are worried about fair...did you know that until just a few years ago there was a separate DUI court system for minorities in Phoenix, Arizona? Yep the minorities- it was set up mostly for illegals- were given shorter sentences and lesser fines because it was felt that they were from another culture where it was ok and they were also poor. Until the program came to the attention of the public in Arizona that brought enough pressure to make them stop illegals were getting a slap on the wrist and citizens were getting nailed to the wall for the very same offense.


89 posted on 06/21/2013 10:30:25 AM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CSM
“For whatever reason you’re stopped, if at night, turn on the interior lights in an attempt to further defuse the situation.”
Actually, the opposite is true. I never would have thought it, but I just spoke with a police officer about it and he said that you should leave your interior lights off. It allows their flash lights to be more effective...I suppose that after their approach to your car, then turning them on would be helpful.

OK, first I've heard of that. Makes sense.

90 posted on 06/21/2013 11:37:19 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
It worked for me. Then again, I don't have an attitude.
Too bad. You won't be of any use in the coming strife.

Evidently being able to see into the future is a side benefit of copping an attitude.

91 posted on 06/21/2013 11:55:02 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Well said.


92 posted on 06/21/2013 4:43:17 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Oatka
Evidently being able to see into the future is a side benefit of copping an attitude.

Absolutely.

Learn it, love it, live it.

93 posted on 06/21/2013 4:46:15 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson