What “politically correct” falsehoods do you have in mind? Predator-prey relationships? Population dynamics? Habitat as a function of abiotic conditions? Perhaps you think that adiabatic temperature change and its influence on the distribution of conifers or developing the practice of intercropping in order to maximize agricultural output is “touchy-feely crapola”, but you’d be wrong, and I’m not surprised.
You have shown on numerous occasions here that you buy into the absurdity that humans can endanger the environment in any broad or lasting way.
We cannot, for thousands of reasons, like the scant population of humans on this massive planet, and the very nature of creation with its self balancing mechanisms.
Its great fun for some to pretend to be powerful, but it is a joke.