"So as usual we are left with nothing economically valuable to show for several years of claimed cold fusion successes. Big claims followed by big excuses, that's the cold fusion way." Deny, delay, denigrate. That is YOUR (and the skeptopath) way. Of course, as usual, you fail to accurately (or at all) compare cold fusion to hot fusion. Which is the bigger failure??? Based on that, which should be funded?? Which DE-funded??
And Lenuco has done a bit more than just incorporate.
All the energy we receive from the sun is hot fusion. We can create a tremendous amount of power with artificial hot fusion. It precisely follows theory and there is no controversy that it works. The problem with turning it into a commercial power source (rather than a weapon) is one of containment.
So what's the problem with cold fusion?