It's claimed excess energy. The sporadic and mostly null results over the 7 experiments make it questionable. George Miley two years ago claimed hundreds of watts of excess power, yet he's never been able to back it up.
One more time..work done in 1996...things have changed since. Replicated repeatedly, excess energy is now a certainty and no longer in doubt. 100% repeatable...no. Sufficiently repeatable for scientific proof...yes.
But this is a typical meme of the pathological skeptics. Once upon a time, one of the biggest names among them said all that was needed was a success rate of greater than 50% of runs. That "milestone" was successfully passed (over a broad range of researchers, the success rate is now > 70% of experiments). At which point the "famous skeptopath" changed the criteria he would accept to 100% repeatability.
"George Miley two years ago claimed hundreds of watts of excess power, yet he's never been able to back it up.
Uh, please cite proof. When I looked into this quite a while ago, it appeared to me that all it proved was the Krivit didn't know how to read a graph.
One more time..work done in 1996...things have changed since. Replicated repeatedly, excess energy is now a certainty and no longer in doubt. 100% repeatable...no. Sufficiently repeatable for scientific proof...yes.
But this is a typical meme of the pathological skeptics. Once upon a time, one of the biggest names among them said all that was needed was a success rate of greater than 50% of runs. That "milestone" was successfully passed (over a broad range of researchers, the success rate is now > 70% of experiments). At which point the "famous skeptopath" changed the criteria he would accept to 100% repeatability.
"George Miley two years ago claimed hundreds of watts of excess power, yet he's never been able to back it up.
Uh, please cite proof. When I looked into this quite a while ago, it appeared to me that all it proved was the Krivit didn't know how to read a graph.