Posted on 05/16/2013 11:35:52 AM PDT by Morgana
If youre not already following The College Fix, run by author and Yale alum Nathan Harden, you should be. It exposes the depraved, anti-woman atmosphere that dominates too many campuses.
I interviewed Harden last year, after the debut of his book, Sex and God at Yale: Porn, Political Correctness, and a Good Education Gone Bad. An entire section of Hardens book is titled Yales War on Women.
He exposed how Yale women are constantly degraded on campus. They are valued for their looks, bodies, and sexual prowess not their minds. They are often required to watch hardcore porn in class and encouraged to participate in porn star lookalike contests during Sex Week, the biggest event of the year. Yale has made headlines for a string of incidents involving fraternities, in which young men marched around campus chanting, No means yes, yes means anal and carried signs declaring, We love Yale sluts. This hostile, threatening environment eventually brought Yale under federal investigation for gender discrimination.
Now Nathan manages The College Fix, which reports on all universities, not just Yale. His group of campus reporters has uncovered a real war on women and its being waged by sexual liberationists who control the academy.
A few weeks ago, The College Fix broke a story about a Pasadena College class devoted entirely to porn. Students are actually assigned to watch porn as part of the class homework.
The most revealing quote was from a female student, who admitted to being uncomfortable with porn before being groomed to accept it as normal: My view of pornography before taking this class was more the traditional view that it was not meant for me, as a woman After, or in the midst of taking this class, Ive become much more accepting of it and understanding of it.
This woman probably felt that porn was not meant for her for a good reason. As The College Fix notes, the scenes shown in class included women being called b-, whore, and worse.
Is it any surprise that cases of sexual misconduct on campuses have reached an all-time high?
We have seen an increase in the number of high-profile cases of sexual assault and harassment on college campuses, Nathan told me during our interview. Unfortunately, many on the academic left who bemoan the hostile sexual environment on our campuses are the same people who have done the most to create that hostile environment. They have embraced moral relativism. They have told students that their sex lives should be considered free of moral consequence, so long as everything is consensual.
But in an environment like this, the boundaries of consent begin to break down. Students who face enormous peer pressure to participate in this free-for-all have trouble saying no when they want to. Other students simply dont respect a no.
Needless to say, students are also indoctrinated to accept abortion as no big deal. In 2008, a Yale student named Aliza Shvarts became pregnant several times, self-aborted with herbs, collected the bloody results in a jar, and called it performance art. Yale and Shvarts issued long-winded, pseudo-intellectual defenses of this art, which Shvarts later claimed was a hoax. To me, the project had an obvious goal: to trivialize abortion.
And they say conservatives and Republicans are the ones waging a war on women! In reality, your chances of being sexually harassed and degraded are much higher on a college campus than at, say, the Values Voters Summit.
Most universities today are run by leftist ideologues and free-love social revolutionaries left over from the sixties, Nathan told me. The hyper-sexual culture has led to a me-first brand of sexuality, where the feelings, the well-being, and even the consent of others is disregarded in an all-out pursuit of getting what I want, when I want it.
This is bad news for women, and its got to stop.
To read more and support Hardens work, visit TheCollegeFix.com.
Liberal minds are intended to be exploited, and girls who can be degraded morally make good Democrats.
And what is wrong with valuing a woman for her “looks,” “body” and “sexual prowess?” I have never had much sympathy for the argument that I must value her for her “mind!” I think the latter argument is an ugly woman’s grab for “inclusion” one of today’s great frauds.
Hasn’t the majority been female on college campuses for a while now? And that’s not even counting the feminized men.
Liberals are physical embodiments of hypocritical, oxymoron’s (stress on the MORON)!!
Liberals want people, especially women, to have sex with abandon as that is a basic “animal” urge. But, they completely ignore the FACT that lions don’t take the lionesses out for dinner, drinks and conversation about their future plans, etc... THEY LOOK FOR THE HOTTEST, BEST LOOKING, MOST FERTILE LOOKING WITH SEXUAL PROWESS!
So, in liberal’s minds, we should all be animalistic, except when/where they don’t want us to be animalistic! These people really are mentally damaged!
I can see it now, the "BJ Clinton College of Adult Studies" at Georgetown.
>>Men are the ones being abused by porn.<<
The idea behind porn isn’t sexual. It is to get men to lessen their value of women as mothers and wives. The class of women that we automatically run to protect from evil and harm.
When you think of your sister as a woman who would sell her body for a better grade in school or a promotion at work the socialists have won the fight.
I’m an old redneck who will do anything for the females in my family because I respect each and every one of them. Those who are wives are fine self respecting ladies. Those who are mothers are devoted moms. Those who are not yet married are honest and gainfully employed, who haven’t yet met a man worthy of them.
Watch the video in my tagline and learn what the fight is all about.
Placemark for pingout.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.