Skip to comments.The dawn of the 'M-word'
Posted on 05/02/2013 7:09:33 AM PDT by rktman
Yes, it would be peachy if everyone could just get along. As the product of a mixed-race marriage who was raised to discern character rather than appearance or creed, I consider myself to be quite tolerant, despite recent accusations to the contrary. The reality of coexistence, however, remains the same as it has been since human beings lived in caves. Its a coin toss as to whether that tribe on the other side of the river no different than their neighbors on this side will determine to coexist, or to attempt to dominate, enslave, or even kill the ones over here.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Thank Yu for posting this.
Political Correctness has taken over. The libs use it to silence anyone from speaking the truth. It’s time to fight back.
No problemo. (see, I’m already starting to tune up my spanish for when that becomes the official language.)
Yup. We still continue to drive the wrong way on the one way street of PCdom. When will we “get it”? Won’t! (Rhetorical of course.)
MUZZIE MUZZIE MUZZIE MUZZIE MUZZIE I say it with great disdain.
Sometimes the best approach is not the direct one. Because the defenses are now raises against “calling a spade a spade”, in this case, calling a Muslim terrorist a Muslim terrorist, perhaps the best approach is to avoid using the word “Muslim” at all, while obviously referring to Muslims.
Oddly enough, this will likely be far more irritating to the usual suspects.
Instead of using the “M” word, use the “B” word, and if it is appropriate, add an expressive modifier.
That is, refer to such actors as “barbarians”, and modified with adjectives, like “primitive barbarians”, “heathen barbarians”, “profane barbarians”, “diseased barbarians”, “unclean barbarians”, and “Satan worshiping barbarians”.
Among other reasons this would be so irritating to Muslims is that, at the time of their founding, they were “more civilized” than the tribal primitives of that time. And over the years, despite all evidence to the contrary, they have tried to think of themselves as “more civilized than civilization”. Even though it is plainly obvious to all that they are indeed primitives.
So by calling Muslim terrorists “barbarians”, it smarts, because it implies that Muslims that put on airs as being civilized are *different* from their murderous, mud worshiping peers. Or if not, then the former are pretending to be civilized but are not.
For example, rewritten from a recent news story:
“After interrogating Dzhokhar Tsarnaev since his capture on Friday, U.S. officials believe the brothers were motivated by “primitive barbarism”, apparently an anti-American, radical version of “unclean barbarism”. Another official called the Boston bombing suspects aspiring “barbarians.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.