Something’s up w him, no question. Anybody who claims to care about the Constitution is going to get vastly more worked up about Obama using it for T-paper than about conservatives on a conservative site arguing in favor of a conservative/rational/common sense/historically substantiated definition of NBC.
Here’s an analogy. Let’s say I claim to care about forest fires. On one side is a group arguing that clearing underbrush deters major fires from getting out of hand too quickly. On the other side is an arsonist setting fire to a vast forest. I spend all my time arguing about underbrush, whilst the arsonist proceeds to burn the forest to the ground.
Doesn’t pass the smell test.
The guy's a paid agent provocateur, no doubt about it. A real conservative might side with the technical arguments he makes about NBC, but in the same breath, they'd express the wish that the Framers had made the qualifications for President much more restrictive.
You'll never hear him express any such viewpoint. Taken as a whole, his entire argument here boils down to; 'Stop exposing Obama's ineligibility for the office of President. He was elected and there's nothing any of you Freepers can do about it, so just shut the hell up.'