MARK STEYN'S LIST THAT LIBERALS USE TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR RADICAL ISLAM

Self | 4/21/2013 | Self-vanity

[SERKIT]

I heard Mark Steyn go through a step-wise liberal media set of evil-doers that seem to be thematic in all of these types of terror events. I am trying to find a written/published run-through which went something like this:

First blamed is right-wing talk radio, then:

Right-wing white males
Christian activists
Tea Party
Then, as Islam is implicated...
Must be a lone wolf
Must be just a small group
Might have been radicalized by a Muslim cleric
Might be Islam-themed, but couldn't be al-Qaeda since they are on the run...

Just trying to get Steyn's excellent list right...

[SERKIT]

By the way, where are the American Muslim clerics denouncing the actions of these two idiots?

[SERKIT]

There is some rich irony in the fact that, during the gun battle and bomb throwing confrontation with police, the little brother ran over and killed the older brother in a getaway car that had a “COEXIST” bumper sticker. You can’t make this stuff up!

[svcw]

They never do

[Old Sarge]

For ourselves and our posterity:

[SERKIT]

The media seems to put blame on old, white, Tea-Party types before ever admitting radical Islam could be involved.

[magna carta]

read Steyn’s “Coexist Bombers”...saw it on Hot Air. Very funny

[Standing Wolf]

By the way, where are the American Muslim clerics denouncing the actions of these two idiots?

Yeah, and where are the "millions" of "peace-loving" "non-radical" Muslims?

[UB355]

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/346146/%E2%80%98co-exist%E2%80%99-bombers

[mnehring]

I think you forgot Sequester

[factoryrat]

The US media has become the entertainment branch of the federal government. All drama, no substance, and completely devoid of facts or truth. In other words, one big socialist soap-opera indoctrination brain-corroding shitfest.

[sbark]

now were hearing that they had to be loners, this was just too low budget, sloppily run to be associated with a “top notch” outfit like Al Queda.....

[combat_boots]

So says Al-Axelrod.

[skinkinthegrass]

bm

[highpockets]

Obama is funding the Muslim Brotherhood. What else does anyone else need to understand? The Muslim Brotherhood is the armed wing of Islam.

By the way Allah is a pimp.

[Cyber Liberty]

That word must always have “Republican” in front of it. It’s a “Republican Sequester.”

[ican'tbelieveit]

whoa, whoa, whoa. How is Columbine right wing?

[highpockets]

And... Muslims are cowards. What is about the Koran that makes it just fine to kill people who unarmed? Yet when these same Muslim cowards have guns around them they hide in boats and want to surrender?

Islam is a theology for men with little itty things in their pants

[QT3.14]

This sums up our alleged news sources:

Whenever I think I've come to the bottom of the media's ability to
snorkel deep inside the holding tanks of overheated Port-O-Sans, I
find there are always previously unseen depths where they lurk.

Gerard Van der Leun
American Digest

[jiggyboy]

Indeed. As in “the bill failed in the Republican-led House”, and NOT EVER as in “the bill failed in the Democrat-led Senate”.

[Cyber Liberty]

It’s actually “the bill failed in the Senate because of the Republican opposition. It’s a very simple template. If some perceived good happened, it is a triumph of the good Democrats in spite of the evil Republicans, but if something bad happens, it was them damnable Republicans getting in the way of the noble Democrats.

The story this week is how happy Republicans are that people in Boston are dead, and if we’d just let the good Democrats collect everybody’s guns things would be wonderful. Expect the pressure to confiscate our weapons to increase.