Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal lawsuit demands Portland Officer Dane Reister be terminated for a 2011 shooting
The Oregonian ^ | April 11, 2013 | Maxine Bernstein, The Oregonian

Posted on 04/16/2013 6:17:43 AM PDT by Altariel

Portland Police Officer Dane Reister should lose his job for suddenly firing a beanbag shotgun that he mistakenly loaded with lethal rounds at a man obviously suffering from a mental illness, a federal lawsuit filed Thursday says.

The attorney for William Kyle Monroe, wounded by Reister on June 30, 2011, accuses the officer, Police Chief Mike Reese and the city of Portland of violating Monroe's civil rights through false arrest, assault and negligence.

The suit seeks more than $11 million in damages.

Monroe, who was 20 at the time and diagnosed with bipolar disorder, narrowly escaped bleeding to death only because OHSU Hospital was near the shooting scene, but he's permanently disabled, his lawyer said.

The suit alleges that the police chief could have prevented such a mistake by prohibiting officers from mixing lethal ammunition with less-lethal munitions in their duty bags, as Reister did. Further, the suit contends, the bureau has failed to adequately discipline officers who are "pre-disposed'' to using excessive force.

"Defendant Reister's conduct was so extreme that it goes beyond all possible bounds of decency, and it constituted conduct that a reasonable person would regard as intolerable in a civilized community," Monroe's attorney Thane Tienson wrote in the suit.

The suit calls on the court to order the Police Bureau to fire Reister and appoint an independent monitor to enforce the terms of the city's pending agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice on use of force policies, training and oversight. The reforms stem from a federal investigation last year that found Portland police engage in a pattern of excessive force against people with mental illness. More Continuing coverage of Portland Police Officer Dane Reister and the shooting of William Monroe. Nearly two years after the shooting, the police chief and city have not disciplined Reister, who remains on paid administrative leave while facing criminal charges, the suit notes. Reister has pleaded not guilty to an indictment charging him with third- and fourth-degree assault charges. The Multnomah County District Attorney's Office added a negligent wounding charge. The indictment marked the first time in the county's history that a grand jury brought criminal charges against a Portland officer for force used on duty.

"By their inaction, said defendants have condoned, ratified or otherwise turned a blind eye to defendant Reister's extreme misconduct and demonstrated a deliberate indifference to the plaintiff's constitutionally protected rights," Tienson wrote in the suit.

Janet Hoffman, Reister's attorney, issued a statement after she informed the officer about the suit Thursday. "Officer Reister is thankful that Mr. Monroe survived and is recovering," she said. "He is looking forward to the facts coming out at trial and fully explaining the situation."

According to the suit, Monroe, who lives with his father in Hillsboro, had intended to drive to Bremerton, Wash., to visit his mother the day before the shooting, but became disoriented and was suffering from a paranoid mania.

He ended up in Lair Hill Park the next morning, where children from a day camp were playing. Monroe pulled discarded flowers out of a park garbage bin and tossed them near the children. Camp supervisors told Monroe to leave the park. Police received two 9-1-1 calls from camp officials. The camp director said in the second call that Monroe may have a pocket knife up his sleeve.

Reister responded to the call. He spotted Monroe on Southwest Naito Parkway, commanded him to stop and get down on his knees with his hands behind his head. Reister asked Monroe if he had any weapons, and Monroe emptied his pockets, discarding his miniature Swiss army knife, the suit says. Monroe put his hands behind his head, but asked why he should get on his knees. Reister grabbed his beanbag shotgun from his car, and two more officers arrived.

Monroe assured police he hadn't done anything wrong as he backed away and then began running and yelled for help. Without warning, the suit says, Reister fired five times, emptying his clip. The fifth round jammed because of Reister's "excessively rapid firing," the suit says.

The shots fractured Monroe's pelvis, punctured his bladder, abdomen and colon. The fourth shot, fired from less than 15 feet away, left a "softball-size hole in his left leg," and severed the sciatic nerve, the suit says.

The next day, then-Mayor Sam Adams and Reese called the shooting a "tragic mistake." The president of the Portland Police Association said the union would "stand by" Reister through the judicial process.

Portland police spokesman Sgt. Pete Simpson said Thursday night that the bureau can no discuss not pending lawsuit.

Four months after the shooting, Reese issued a new policy, requiring that beanbag ammunition be stored only in a carrier attached to the side or stock of the orange-painted, 12-gauge beanbag shotguns.

Five years earlier, the suit noted, Reister mistakenly fired a loaded riot-suppression launcher during training, injuring an officer posing as a protester with a smoke round.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; portland

1 posted on 04/16/2013 6:17:43 AM PDT by Altariel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Altariel
Portland Police Officer Dane Reister should lose his job for suddenly firing a beanbag shotgun that he mistakenly loaded with lethal rounds at a man obviously suffering from a mental illness, a federal lawsuit filed Thursday says.

I'm not generally a fan of lawsuits, especially over police exercise of force against people who are acting in a peculiar or threatening manner, but this is an extreme case. I'm surprised that a lawsuit is needed to get rid of this cop. What possible justification could the Portland police have for keeping a guy who has even once "accidentally" loaded and lived ammo when he claims to have meant to use a beanbag? I've always had high standards for my employees, and that if far beyond the level of stupidity that would have cost my people their jobs. How can the police keep him if they are wondering what the lawsuit would be like the second time a cop shot someone after a mistake like this or any reckless firearms error?

2 posted on 04/16/2013 6:23:14 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

I submit that the very “mistake” demonstrates incompetence worthy of termination.


3 posted on 04/16/2013 6:29:15 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
and that if far beyond the level of stupidity that would have cost my people their jobs.

Don't think stupidity. Think sociopath who is in a job that lets him get away with aggrevated assault and attempted murder.

4 posted on 04/16/2013 6:30:41 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Yep. Just short of war, a license to murder.


5 posted on 04/16/2013 6:33:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Altariel
Portland Police Officer Dane Reister should lose his job for suddenly firing a beanbag shotgun that he mistakenly loaded with lethal rounds at a man obviously suffering from a mental illness, a federal lawsuit filed Thursday says.

If you're too dumb to know what your gun's loaded with, you do not belong in a police uniform.

6 posted on 04/16/2013 7:15:12 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

Stuff like this just makes me shake my head when people talk about how only cops and military should be armed.


7 posted on 04/16/2013 7:23:24 AM PDT by Gefreiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
Stuff like this just makes me shake my head when people talk about how only cops and military should be armed.

They don't care about stuff like this. The overwhelming priority for them is to eliminate the population's ability to resist the government. The phrase "consent of the governed" doesn't mean anything to them.

8 posted on 04/16/2013 8:01:30 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
The phrase “consent of the governed” doesn't mean anything to them. . . . .
_____________________________________________

I think this police officer is a criminal who should be caged for a long time and I have to agree with the law suit. If the people of Portland have to pay a high price for the mistakes of their law enforcment officers perhaps they will have a desire to hold them more accountable and they will reduce their mistakes.

The leftists in our government want complete control of us. They will have it one way or another. We have been a nation of honest people but leftist don't play by rules of honesty. To Democrats or leftists, they are the same, the ends justify the means.

They will take away your ability to overthrow the government if they can. That means you won't be able to beat them at the ballot box because they stuff the ballot box and you won't be able to take over by armed rebellion because you can't do that with a few handguns that are good for 5 yards. They will take away your ability to feed yourself if they can. They will make you absolutely their slaves. I pitty you if you are young, you will see much sorrow. I am old and will not live long enough to see some of it but what I have already seen sickens me.

I hope the militias are able to be well armed when needed.

9 posted on 04/16/2013 8:19:29 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig
If the people of Portland have to pay a high price for the mistakes of their law enforcment officers perhaps they will have a desire to hold them more accountable and they will reduce their mistakes.

The problem is that the people DON'T have any way to hold the police accountable. Civilian review boards? A joke. They have NO enforcement power. And I wouldn't call this a "mistake." I would call it a sociopath in blue getting caught although most of them get away with it.

10 posted on 04/16/2013 8:22:53 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

I don’t think Dane is the sharpest knife in the dwarer. Amazing that they did not fire him. We love dangerous incompetence on local police forces, I guess.


11 posted on 04/16/2013 10:12:49 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson