[Steely Tom]

They play with words.

We play with other things.

[mountainlion]

Never heard of “co-founder of the National Capital Tea Party Patriots and a homosexual”

[count-your-change]

Children have already been redefined. In America they’re just fetal material that escaped the abortionist’s bloody hands.

[V_TWIN]

” If we attempt to redefine marriage, we’re going to redefine children in the same way.”

Isnt that their whole objective?

[stuartcr]

Aren’t children really just young humans? How could that be re-defined?

[Maelstorm]

Here’s a good article from a bisexual raised by two moms.

Growing Up With Two Moms: The Untold Children’s View by Robert Oscar Lopez

http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/08/6065/

[BenLurkin]

The current crop in DC sees children as property of the State.

[Cicero]

Unfortunately, there is no copyright on the words “Tea Party.” So the Tea Party has been repeatedly invaded by imposters, or imposters in various states have formed their own fake Tea Parties.

It’s a regrettable side effect of the fact that Tea Parties are independent organizations. That’s what’s good about them, but also what’s dangerous about them.

[ExCTCitizen]

Three opponents of same-sex “marriage” spoke at the conservative Heritage Foundation on Monday, including the gay co-founder of the National Capital Tea Party Patriots who argued that children are entitled to a biological mother and a father, and that if the government seeks to redefine marriage to include homosexual couples, it will necessarily also be redefining children.

“The redefining of marriage, quite frankly I think it’s nuts,” said Doug Mainwaring, co-founder of the National Capital Tea Party Patriots and a homosexual. “Being gay, I’ve had a long time to consider this, look at it.”

“I used to be pro-same-sex marriage, but the more I thought about it, it occurred to me this just isn’t right,” he said. “Marriage is the most successful institution that civilization has produced over the last few millennia, and we shouldn’t mess with it. If we attempt to redefine marriage, we’re going to redefine children in the same way. In fact, I prefer to use the term ‘undefine’.” …

Liberals will define children in same sex households as 'SexToys', if they got their way!!

[blueunicorn6]

Can a young male homosexual be legally considered as the “child” of an older male homosexual? If so, how does this affect inheritances and benefits? Yeah, buddy, now you’re going to find out what the homosexuals really want.