She's no more a "victim" than a drunk driver that wraps their car around a tree: except you can't prosecute a tree to mitigate your lack of judgement.
Load of crap. The rapists used free will to attack her. They aren’t trees who she happened to run into.
Sure she was drunk, but that does not make her any less a victim.
You are a disgusting pig.
She was drunk but she never said “yes”.
Also she was underage which begs a bigger question “who got her the booze”????
Yes such nice /sarc jocks and their booze. Hope each one looses their scholarships.
Wow. I just learned something new: if you're a really drunk girl, that means it's "okay" for guys to rape you. Boy-howdy! I'm glad I learned this before it was too late. /oh, yes, certainly sarc>
No, I disagree.
She likely did not have 27 beers before this happened. It’s more likely that she had one drink, but it was laced with GHB or something similar.
you are so very wrong. a drunk driver actually takes action that involves a deadly weapon. yes this young woman acted stupidly and was drunk out of her mind....these pigs that call themselves ‘men’ raped an unconcious victim and boasted about it....slime pure and simple
So, a kid does something stupid and becomes a participant rather than a victim? If I have too much to drink, leave my car at the pub and walk home and get mugged on the way, was I a non-victim too?