Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Issues Order Setting Off ‘Slow Grind’ of Budget Cuts
http://www.newsmax.com ^ | Friday, 01 Mar 2013 10:00 PM | http://www.newsmax.com

Posted on 03/01/2013 9:17:15 PM PST by Maelstorm

President Barack Obama ordered the start of $85 billion in government spending cuts, beginning a potentially decade-long wave of belt-tightening that risks curbing U.S. economic growth this year. The White House released the order tonight, the deadline set by a law passed two years ago to avoid a debt default, and the Office of Management and Budget sent Congress a detailed list of program cuts. The reductions’ impact will become clear over the next several weeks, as agencies inform affected government contractors and notify employees about furloughs, most of which wouldn’t begin until some time in April.

“What’s important to understand is that not everyone will feel the pain of these cuts right away,” Obama said at the White House earlier in the day, after meeting with the top four leaders of Congress. “The pain, though, will be real.”

The across-the-board cuts, known as sequestration, were intended to be so onerous that Congress and the president wouldn’t let them occur and would come up with a plan to replace them. Instead, Democrats and Republicans deadlocked on an alternative. Obama insisted that any plan must include new tax revenue and Republicans, led by House Speaker John Boehner, rejected that approach.

The amount to be cut under the law totals $1.2 trillion over nine years. Of that, $85 billion comes out of the budget for the remaining seven months of this fiscal year, making for effective reductions of about 13 percent for defense programs and 9 percent for non-defense programs, according to the Office of Management and Budget.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: cuts; sequester; sequestercuts; sequesterday; winning
Its about damn time! The GOP isn't off the hook but I'm a lot happier they finally stood strong and stopped playing Obama's game. If Obama's government officials can't handle these miniscule cuts without major pain they aren't fit for the jobs they have.

I worked in the federal government as a contractor to both the DoD and DHS for nearly a decade. I saw first hand the fraud, waste, and duplication of effort. I helped develope systems to automate detecting it though it really wasn't a high priority to managers more concerned with perception and making sure to maximize the number of minions they were managing. That said there's a lot of hard working folks in government but there are also lot of folks just filling spots and programs that are absolutely just tech boondoggles which offer little or no value except to boost the resume of the management preparing them for a lucrative post civil service contracting positions in the "private" sector.

If there is any REAL significate pain from these cuts every citizen should know that it is being manufactured for their benefit and manipulation. Its a mind game. The GOP just needs to continue to point out how small these cuts really are and keep the finger on administration officials if they pull crap like Janet Napolitano releasing illegal aliens while keeping stupid programs to simulate zombie outbreaks. I think the GOP realized with this that they have an opportunity in these sequester "cuts". They should get ready to call Obama admin officials before congress over and over again during this process.

1 posted on 03/01/2013 9:17:25 PM PST by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
"but I'm a lot happier they finally stood strong and stopped playing Obama's game"

I agree with that. Do you all realize the significance of this , that the Republicans stood up to obama and the media, that finally this might be a cut in government ( there has never been one).

My research showed as this article does that many government agencies even the EPA will get 9% cut even before inflation. with inflation that is even a greater cut.
The following is a quote from this Fox news article .

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/01/sequestration-when-will-feel-pain/#ixzz2MKxTcS

Obama formally notifies government agencies that sequestration is in effect.

Sometime today the Office of Management and Budget will order all federal agencies to cut their budgets by around nine percent, except for the Pentagon which needs to cut defense programs by 13 percent.

Once Obama issues the sequestration order, Treasury Department officials will take offline the computers that process payments for school construction and clean energy bonds to reprogram them for reduced rates. Payments will be delayed while they are made manually for the next six weeks.

Employees at the Environmental Protection Agency will get e-mails notifying them that a forced furlough of up to 13 days lies ahead

At the Department of Housing and Urban Development, officials will spend the weekend mailing out letters to governors in all 50 states showing how much their grants will be reduced in the coming days and weeks.

Programs that dole out funding as an intermediary — like public rent assistance, farm loans and food programs — will see immediate cuts

Even if the budget for some of these gov agencies stayed the same that would be a cut because of inflation. see the military will get a 13% cut but those dollars will have even less value because of inflation so then they will be able to buy less tanks etc. because those dollars have less value even if budget stayed the same. . .
2 posted on 03/01/2013 9:32:53 PM PST by Democrat_media (media makes mass shooters household names to create more & take our guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

The only thing that concerns me is that this “ends justifies the means” administration will purposely crash the economy with the sole purpose of blaming the GOP.


3 posted on 03/01/2013 9:33:32 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
belt-tightening that risks curbing U.S. economic growth this year.

So Newsmax is now slapping its byline on AP wire editorials, too?

4 posted on 03/01/2013 9:38:24 PM PST by FredZarguna (I ride around nights mostly...subways, buses...If I'm gonna do that I might as well get paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Well, inasmuch as their attempts to “stimulate” the economy have essentially destroyed it, they can hardly do worse if they actually try ...


5 posted on 03/01/2013 9:40:24 PM PST by FredZarguna (I ride around nights mostly...subways, buses...If I'm gonna do that I might as well get paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Any cut to the EPA makes me smile. The thing is the military expense isn’t about just buying tanks and there are many projects that are just crap just like in other parts of the government. Not everything is essential because it is labeled military. The same goes for countless other categories. If any additional danger comes to our soldiers it will not be because of these cuts but because of the Obama Administration’s choice.


6 posted on 03/01/2013 10:18:29 PM PST by Maelstorm (This country wasn't founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Yeah Newsmax does parrot too much AP crap. Its a Ruddy thing.


7 posted on 03/01/2013 10:19:50 PM PST by Maelstorm (This country wasn't founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

There is a problem with that line of “reasoning” which is it assumes government spending is the primary driver of the economy. It isn’t. The way government hurts the economy is primarily is by growing. It may not hurt the Washington DC environment but it sucks money away from other non governmental sectors and drives money unnaturally towards DC in an almost closed loop. This sequester will result in a stronger economy. Sure there will be some pain for those who are benefiting the most off the endless growth of government but it will be no more or less than anyone in the private sector goes through when a business isn’t profitable and thus isn’t viable or needed. The GOP needs to stop worrying about getting blamed and start standing up and leading like they did today. They did the right thing and it should be easy to point that out to the American people. The question I’d ask reporters who try to play the blame game is “Do you really believe the federal Government cant absorb this miniscule cut?”.


8 posted on 03/01/2013 10:29:59 PM PST by Maelstorm (This country wasn't founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Exactly. The Obama admin has put in place a big economic suppresser in Obamacare. Federal spending isn’t what drives economic growth.Its the private sector. Even if it appears in some cases that federal spending is driving economic growth it is an illusion because those $ feeding it are being consumed and are not self sustaining as is the case in the private sector driven by free market supply and demand.

Here are a few clips where Milton Friedman destorys the notion that government spending drives economic growth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hrg1CArkuNc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p31-xQ2Rrz4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRpEV2tmYz4

The thing that really stands out is the authority with which Friedman addresses the debate. He doesn’t come at it from a position of lack of confidence or apology as so many of our politicians do.


9 posted on 03/01/2013 10:50:56 PM PST by Maelstorm (This country wasn't founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

“that finally this might be a cut in government ( there has never been one). “

This isn’t even a start!

This is only a cut in the increase from last year, IT’S STILL A BUDGET INCREASE!!!!!


10 posted on 03/01/2013 10:53:18 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I do believe that this fiscal year’s worth of ‘budget cuts’ were fairy much off-set by the Administration’s issuance of $80 billion worth of Treasurys today...http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-01/there-goes-sequester. NOTHING is settled. Taking from one hand, giving it to the other. The deception continues.....


11 posted on 03/01/2013 10:53:51 PM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Obama insisted that any plan must include new tax revenue and Republicans, led by House Speaker John Boehner, rejected that approach.

Do my eyes deceive me or did Boner get a transplant of a (very small) pair of balls? It's not much but after going 0 for 25-30, it feels good for right now to savor this smidgeon of courage by Boner & McConnell. Now if they would only keep it up! I'm still very much concerned that they will pull the rug out from underneath us, and cave instantly in order to stay on the Washington DC dipshit cocktail circuit.

12 posted on 03/01/2013 10:59:09 PM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Al Sharpton said "Say whaaaaaa?"...

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/1919/slide_1919_25408_large.jpg

13 posted on 03/02/2013 12:06:18 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

What do I think Obama will cut?

Firing pins for the military M16 rifles.
Triggers for the entire US nuclear arsenal.
Toilet paper in handicap bathroom stalls.
Medicine for babies.
Level 5 maximum security prison guards.
Air traffic controller training.
Tax refund check printers.
Workers doing background checks when someone buys a new firearm.


14 posted on 03/02/2013 1:34:34 AM PST by trailboss800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Wow...I wish I could share your optimism.

What I think is going to fail in this effort is the very message the GOP STILL has muddled and fails to articulate.

This was not a cut in current spending, it was a cut in new/projected spending. The government didn't take a paycut, but finally, they didn't get a raise either!

What will happen, and 0bama’s regime has already shown its’ hand on this, is they will order severe cuts that in no way correlate to the amount of the sequester.

The best example so far? DHS release of illegals. The number of illegals ‘ordered’ released equates to 3 times more than the budget cut requires.

Make no mistake my FRiend, while we need budget cuts, 0bama has no intention of doing so to benefit the country or meet his constitutional responsibility. He is going to order the exact opposite and with excessive ‘political terrorism’ in order to destroy all opposition.

15 posted on 03/02/2013 3:10:40 AM PST by EBH ( The 2nd Amendment exists for times like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

So, wait a minute.
If Obama is deciding what to cut that would make him a......
wait for it....

Dictator!

If Congress is responsible for budgets then they would be responsible for cuts as well.


16 posted on 03/02/2013 4:17:43 AM PST by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningful to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
If Obama's government officials can't handle these miniscule cuts without major pain they aren't fit for the jobs they have.

Like most libtards "forced" to cut spending, they will go for maximum inconvience to the general public.

17 posted on 03/02/2013 4:20:31 AM PST by CPOSharky (zero slogan: Expect less, pay more. (apologies to Target))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Any cut to the EPA makes me smile. The thing is the military expense isn’t about just buying tanks and there are many projects that are just crap just like in other parts of the government. Not everything is essential because it is labeled military. The same goes for countless other categories. If any additional danger comes to our soldiers it will not be because of these cuts but because of the Obama Administration’s choice.

All true. Still have to understand that it's really bureaucrats that make the Pentagon go round and round (in a 5-sided fashion) and when they claim they can't "gas up" a carrier to send out to a hot spot, they are part of the overall problem and will not hesitate to screw the military they "support". Look for cuts in critical areas while the crapola maintains funding.

18 posted on 03/02/2013 4:21:42 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trailboss800
My brother, who's a mid-level IRS manager, was recently brought out from Kansas City for additional training in the DC area. His crew got to tour the White Hut and get a brief pep talk from the big cheese.

I'm afraid my brother just sees his own star rising, as if he's there because he's done a good job. Feh!

HF

19 posted on 03/02/2013 6:04:56 AM PST by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

They’ve completely failed to manage cost, and yet expect those who do have to manage their cost to pay for their spending.


20 posted on 03/02/2013 7:25:52 AM PST by Son House (Romney Plan: Cap Spending At 20 Percent Of GDP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Boehner needs to be the one who manages cost, being no one else will. Man up, Speaker.


21 posted on 03/02/2013 7:27:12 AM PST by Son House (Romney Plan: Cap Spending At 20 Percent Of GDP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Another obscurity is the tax revenue to GDP, it’s down to 16% because there is less economic activity, not because Democrats need to raise taxes to increase the tax revenue to GDP ratio, Mr Julian(FOX Business Block), that’s not how Macroeconomics works, your only advocating tax increases that have been shown to decrease total GDP.


22 posted on 03/02/2013 7:31:50 AM PST by Son House (Romney Plan: Cap Spending At 20 Percent Of GDP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Government did get a raise, that’s another point Boehner needs to follow up on, Democrats got their tax increases, Republicans needs to show the data it decreases tax revenue collected.


23 posted on 03/02/2013 7:41:52 AM PST by Son House (Romney Plan: Cap Spending At 20 Percent Of GDP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Well Obama, if you so regret having to issue these orders, you can always resign the office. Then you need not suffer such anguish.


24 posted on 03/02/2013 8:44:15 AM PST by theDentist (FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
I'm more concerned about a concealed (illegal or just plain stupid) action by the administration (e.g. Fast and Furious) that sets off a currency war or increases in interest rates or enables a war through negligence. They have way overplayed the consequences of this sequester, but in an effort to cloud their own deceit and blame the GOP in the process I wouldn't put anything past them including shooting the whole country in the foot.
25 posted on 03/04/2013 5:50:54 AM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson