Their religion isn't important - that's just a strawman people throw out in order to dissuade any critical inquiry into the global bankster agenda (21).
The Rothschilds may be Jewish but the Rockefellers aren't, and again it has nothing to do with their faith, especially since the Saudis are in on the action, too.
So to answer your question, the answer is no, we're not back to that again. The bankster agenda isn't even a conspiracy. They are quite open and brazen about it now.
If the headline writer wanted to say that "bankers" were arrested, I would understand why that might happen -- a lot of bankers are doing a lot of bad stuff.
Although I am not Jewish, I have been around long enough to know that some people use code words:
Jewish Bankers -- that's clear
International Bankers -- that means Jewish bankers
Rothschild Bankers -- that means Jewish bankers
Foreign Bankers -- that means Jewish Bankers.
The body of the report talks about Rockefeller Bankers -- I'm fine with that, I may be cynical, but even I cannot claim that this is a crypto reference to Jewish banking: Rockefellers are not Jewish. But the headline says Rothschild Bankers. I think that sets off bells for a lot of people. They wink. They nod. They know what is being talked about.
I get real nervous when there are hints of any sort of world-wide Jewish Conspiracy. I've seen that movie before.
Now, a world-wide banking conspiracy ... I can accept that concept. I just think throwing in "Rothschild" as a modifier is unecessary and unwise.