Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; Fiji Hill

I should have looked it up. I was going from memory, when I was young, and there was a lot of talk about both Tafts.

Anyway, the Establishment thought that Taft was too conservative to win, but figured that Eisenhower, as a five-star war hero, would be a shoe-in.


7 posted on 02/02/2013 5:07:46 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

And as it turned out, Eisenhower was a disaster for the GOP after 1952, ending with the calamitous 1958 elections and the Kennedy “victory” in 1960. It would’ve been better had the ticket of Taft-MacArthur had won in 1952 (Taft would’ve died regardless in the Summer of ‘53, and a President MacArthur would’ve been more proactive in dealing with the Communist menace both abroad and domestically).


8 posted on 02/02/2013 6:02:17 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson