Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio

That is probably good for the Republicans.

Brown lost the Senate seat he had. Apparently, the voters were not that impressed with his previous Senate tenure.


8 posted on 02/01/2013 10:37:27 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy
Exactly. And in addition, as a Romney-selected Romney-toadee
Scott Brown nearly always voted with the DNC,
so what difference does it make?


11 posted on 02/01/2013 10:44:37 AM PST by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
Brown lost the Senate seat he had. Apparently, the voters were not that impressed with his previous Senate tenure.

It's the off-year vs. presidential election. He has a shot in an off-year election.

I know he sucks. But that doesn't mean he'd be ten times better than typical Massachusetts Marxists, like Elizabeth Warren.

Bad news, as far as I'm concerned.

20 posted on 02/01/2013 11:12:16 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
Brown lost the Senate seat he had. Apparently, the voters were not that impressed with his previous Senate tenure.

In my view it was more about the average voter in that state hearing "You didn't build that, let's kick a banker in the groin and steal his wallet" and liking what they heard.


29 posted on 02/01/2013 11:40:38 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson