To: raccoonradio
That is probably good for the Republicans.
Brown lost the Senate seat he had. Apparently, the voters were not that impressed with his previous Senate tenure.
8 posted on
02/01/2013 10:37:27 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Exactly. And in addition, as a Romney-selected Romney-toadee
Scott Brown nearly always voted with the DNC,
so what difference does it make?
11 posted on
02/01/2013 10:44:37 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: TomGuy
Brown lost the Senate seat he had. Apparently, the voters were not that impressed with his previous Senate tenure. It's the off-year vs. presidential election. He has a shot in an off-year election.
I know he sucks. But that doesn't mean he'd be ten times better than typical Massachusetts Marxists, like Elizabeth Warren.
Bad news, as far as I'm concerned.
To: TomGuy
Brown lost the Senate seat he had. Apparently, the voters were not that impressed with his previous Senate tenure.
In my view it was more about the average voter in that state hearing "You didn't build that, let's kick a banker in the groin and steal his wallet" and liking what they heard.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson