[D Rider]

Did she take away individuals private guns? Or just state supplied guns? That would be a major difference. Of course, that difference would be lost on the left

[UCANSEE2]

Did she take away individuals private guns? Or just state supplied guns?

She didn't take away any one's guns. These GUNS were privately owned, and they STILL HAVE THOSE GUNS. The Alaskan Government removed the groups POLICING powers because of the legal problems due to lack of training, and a commander whose acts were becoming questionable.

SOURCE: Defense commander resigns after complaints

[2ndDivisionVet]

This is what Governor Palin said on August 1, 2009:

“And by the way… On health care issues going on in D.C. right now? Be wary when some kind of tie-in occurs; Because it will come up: A tie-in with guns in an attempt to take away our Second Amendment rights under the guise of some new health care plan – You know that this is coming – That the two issues will somehow crop up and they’ll be tied together. So we have to be very wary on this.” ~ Governor Sarah Palin, August 1, 2009 Anchorage, Alaska

[Still Thinking]

Did she take away individuals private guns? Or just state supplied guns? That would be a major difference. Of course, that difference would be lost on the left

Correct. To libs, having a right to something means lib constituents must be provided one of whatever it is from the public purse.