Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS; buffaloguy
The term “proclivities” is too vague and represents a mere opinion. Be specific, with whom did Hitler have homosexual relations?

The problem is that most of the people in a position to know first hand, or be named were dead by 1948. Of those who were not dead, highest ranking Nazi most likely to have had some sexual contact with Hitler is Rudolph Hess.

72 posted on 01/19/2013 2:25:46 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: fso301
In short, beyond mere opinion there is a a lack of evidentiary support. He was too big a power for there to be a lack of evidence of such behavior. I follow the rule: "for an extraordinary claim there must be extraordinary evidence."

The same claims of homosexuality are made against J. Edgar Hoover. Claims made it should be noted after he was dead. The morals at that time were so strictly exclusive of sodomy that the slightest hint would have destroyed him. Hoover was so powerful and thus made so many enemies that if in fact he was a cross dresser and/or homosexual those very same enemies would have seized upon those "facts" and destroyed him. Even Presidents feared that man's data files.

73 posted on 01/19/2013 3:07:09 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson