Especially to National Socialists, and career politicians.
So I should send the president letters from each of my children and ask him why his daughters and the children of other lawmakers and media members deserve armed security at their schools while America’s public school children deserve no security beyond having visitors to schools sign in at the front office?
The state must declare those who died at Benghazi precious also. When is The Incompetent One going to surround himself with the grieving members of their families and explain why he didn’t send help?
And when is he going to let the Benghazi survivors tell their side of the story? Why haven’t we heard from them?
That is not from Mein Kampf or from hitler. It is actually a manufactured quote derived from a passage in a fictional letter written by Rabbi Daniel Lapin in 2004.
Here is the whole paragraph, it has more to do with Margaret Sanger than with coercing a people into fascistic totalitarianism:
“The folkish state must make up for what everyone else today has neglected in this field. It must set race in the center of all life. It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must see to it that only the healthy beget children; that there is only one disgrace: despite one’s own sickness and deficiencies to bring children into the world, and one highest honor: to renounce doing so. And conversely it must be considered reprehensible: to withhold healthy children from the nation. Here the state must act as the guardian of a millennial future in the face of which the wishes and the selfishness of the individual must appear as nothing and submit. It must put the most modern medical means in the service of this knowledge. It must declare unfit for propagation all who are in any way visibly sick or who have inherited a disease and can therefore pass it on, and put this into actual practice. Conversely, it must take care that the fertility of the healthy woman is not limited by the financial irresponsibility of a state régime which turns the blessing of children into a curse for the parents. It must put an end to that lazy, nay criminal, indifference with which the social premises for a fecund family are treated today, and must instead feel itself to be the highest guardian of this most precious blessing of a people. Its concern belongs more to the child than to the adult.”
