You keep using the words “cover up” as if they are facts. They aren’t.
The looming trials of Schultz, Curley, and Spanier will determine that. If they ever happen.
You obviously still need some life lessons. So we’ll start with because someone says something - say louis freeh or mike greenberg - it doesn’t make it true.
There is no “cover up”. There was no “cover up”. It makes no sense. If there was a “cover up”, why all the testimony? You run your mouth, but you don’t think.
It was just a bunch of bumbling administrators trying to deal with someone that (at the time) they thought had “boundary issues.”
Looking back, it’s easy to pile on knowing what we know now. At the time, they didn’t know anything. One incident (1998), which was obviously deferred by every local agency.
FlJoePa,
Do you believe Jerry Sandusky molested a child or children on the campus of PSU?