Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: No Left Turn

You’re asking me to prove a negative? How about you prove to me that Joe DID know about 1998.

If he WAS told about 1998 (it would have been by Schultz), then Schultz would have been violating PA law. Which makes perfect sense.

Franco has spoken on this very issue numerous times. Maybe you should check out some of the work John Ziegler and Franco have been doing instead of listening to mike and mike.

Franco is also on record (on video) saying MM told him he told Joe practically nothing that morning. Is Franco a liar now?


46 posted on 01/06/2013 4:59:41 PM PST by FlJoePa ("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: FlJoePa
You’re asking me to prove a negative?

How did I do that? By saying your idea of "evidence" in making your case is pretty flimsy? A book by a guy who lived with paterno for a year is solid evidence, but an investigative report by an FBI Director is not.

And apparently, according to your earlier post, you were there when JoePa told Sandusky why he should retire. I didn't see any other evidence cited for that.

Again, to my question: Do you believe Jerry Sandusky molested children on the campus of PSU? You should be able to answer that with yes or no.
49 posted on 01/06/2013 5:24:46 PM PST by No Left Turn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson