Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/17/2012 7:45:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
Tamihere’s 1990 conviction came despite no bodies being found, and was based on a Crown argument that 21 year old Heidi and 23 year old Urban were murdered at Crosbie’s Clearing, near Thames on Saturday 8 April 1989, and that Tamihere had stolen Urban Hoglin’s watch from the body and given it to his ten year old son.

In the two decades since the conviction, much new evidence has emerged, including the discovery of Hoglin’s body in 1991, 73km from where police said he died, and still wearing his watch.

Wow a mere year after the man’s conviction for murder and this new evidence was not enough to reopen the case.

If the watch was the prosecutions big ticket physical evidence linking the suspect to the murder I think they would open the case. But then lawyers are a bit sticky about being embarrassed.

You got it wrong you twits!!!

2 posted on 12/18/2012 2:07:30 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson