In the two decades since the conviction, much new evidence has emerged, including the discovery of Hoglins body in 1991, 73km from where police said he died, and still wearing his watch.
Wow a mere year after the mans conviction for murder and this new evidence was not enough to reopen the case.
If the watch was the prosecutions big ticket physical evidence linking the suspect to the murder I think they would open the case. But then lawyers are a bit sticky about being embarrassed.
You got it wrong you twits!!!