Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper
Here is his obit. It is refreshing what people accomplished 70 years ago without a formal higher education.
3 posted on 11/22/2012 7:51:26 AM PST by Perdogg (Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA4) for President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg
It is amazing what people did back when government wasn't interfering. John Moses Browning is my favorite firearm designer, but Stoner is right up there near the top of the list.

/johnny

6 posted on 11/22/2012 7:57:51 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

He got his education as he was working in aviation plants. As an engineer, when one looks at Stoner’s designs, you can see the aviation manufacturing influence on his designs. Unlike Browning’s designs, which were clearly the work of a gunsmith, Stoner’s designs solve various problems in ways that are most easily manufactured, not the typical ways that gunsmiths would build up guns (especially the lockwork) from a bunch of small, fiddly parts that had been hand-fitted.

Stoner also benefitted from the time period in which he designed his guns - it was the timeframe in which NC (numerically controlled) machines were coming into being, and you could program machine operations onto a punched paper tape to get repeatability. Prior to the late 50’s, gun makers had to set up huge machine shops, usually with one machine dedicated to one operation in a production line in order to get throughput and repeatability. Reading of how much machinery and investment in tooling Winchester put into something as simple as the Model 12 pump shotgun astounds me today.


11 posted on 11/22/2012 9:51:00 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson