how many can't pass the drug screen???Click-Bond is in Carson City, Nevada at the airport.
Blacks, Hispanics, sex deviates, and minorities only need apply.
bttt
Are they trying to tell us that the tens of millions of illegal invaders aren’t qualified? Then why the hell are we allowing them to enter and remain?
how many can't pass the drug screen???Half of the staff at CBS could get hired as janitors.
I've have plenty of options with over 20 years experience in my specialty but I shudder for younger Americans who are not as qualified.
Unfortunately, the reporter missed an opportunity to inquire with the ALCOA president, who is from Germany, about the differences between the education systems in the two countries in areas such as technical skill preparation and internships with industry.
If employers can’t get skilled people for their jobs, they’re not paying enough. That’s how it works. Offer jobs for say, welders, at $15 an hour and you’ll be whining about there not being qualified applicants. Offer jobs for $30 an hour and they’ll be lined up around the block. Welders earning $25 an hour will quit and come work for you.
$12 bucks an hour! That ought to bring in the top talent.
This is the companies' cry for the govt. to "do something". Or, in other words, pay the companies money to train people or open the borders to increase competition so they can get people for lower wages.
When I was younger, I operated on an assumption that employers were honest. You will remember that young people tried hard to write well, a worthy resume, because we were told that it mattered. We were told that, by somebody who fussed over the header, and then “this line” and then “that line” ... and we wondered and worried that it seemed, to get the attention of an employer, *There was a ‘correct form of resume’ to do that?!*
We next learned, that what job applicants and resumes do, as we submitted them in response to Help Wanted ads in the newspapers, is to help employers figure out who and what employers need/want, and *then* the want ad changes as the search is refined.
I remember when HR dept.’s were formed to replace “The Personnel Dept.” HR was created to offer a management post to women, and HR became more incapable of understanding “what kind of work we do around here.” HR did *not* know what it was looking for, and it became imperative for an applicant to do an end-around that roadblock and find the management of the area in which you were going to be working, you hoped.
A bit later, HR became indispensible, as government regulations forced companies to comply; a lot of fuss about minutiae un-related to skill that is required to produce -— there was a boost in *non-productive* labor.
It was at that point, I ran into trouble. I would succeed at bypassing HR and having good relations with management *who knew how to produce* and *who wanted me to work for them* ... but by then, fussy HR managers would assert that “the chain of command had been thwarted!” as they complained that their fiefdoms had been reduced to “just a personnel dept., once again.”
It did not matter that I had proven that I could do the work, as some manager let me run thru some paces and assemble one of the company’s hydraulic pumps that I’d never seen before, and also did that in record time. He was all smiles, “Golly, *that* was easy.” Yet, the ladies running HR were obsessed with “all prospects must come thru me!”
One exec. was kind enough to detail how my application would fail, as his company’s HR “lady” would simply tear up anything in response to how you sounded over the phone (I had asked to speak with so-and-so in manufacturing, and that was considered “bad form.” Funny, I just ran into that same problem lately, where a lady, in the absence of her boss, assumed that she has a lot of power and resented my reminding her that she is not the boss. Given that I outranked her, she practically “blew up on the pad.”)
Meanwhile at the top of the food chain, I remember an old fellow who had once been the boss of a major manufacturer and then retired; he’d been my boss, too, back in the early 1970’s.
When I saw him in the early 1980’s, he was very specific about “the new breed” that “are pirates” and have “no connection with production - they’re just ‘here’ to take the money and run.” IOW, he lamented the loss of capitalists.
Now, we have charletans and pretenders, schemers, banksters and the lot of “the suits.” The cost of management, the cost of doing business *as it is affected by the burdens imposed by government,* are being *ignored* by them whose pay exceeds hundreds of thousands of dollars / year and cannot be justified.
They have “Compensation Committee meetings.” It is a disgusting self-congratulatory, back-slapping, mutual admiration society, where no one ever mentions their direct connection to production - actual output - because none can prove their importance on the shop floor, or on the docks, or in the field. They are basically princes holding onto thrones.
They have a lot of brain power in many instances, but *they* *do* *not* *care* about people *who have no power to affect their scheme of participation in the income ladder.*
They would immediately accept a govt-run-barracks of “sustainable working quarters” jammed full of H1B visas, that relieved them of doing anything in management related to *labor management.*
The unions are not clueless, but they are too greedy to help their members realize, that the progressives, now, still need to get out the vote in the name of the union, but otherwise, unions will be folded into government, for the purpose of enforcing U.S. Government Workers Barracks Regulations.
Free TV, free Wi-Fi, free cell phones; all the usual workers paradise amenities, along with the unrest caused by being jammed into government housing.
All, the outcome of “the brain trust of suits” who have no guts to resist the cost of government.