Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagman
I recall that among the advantages which the North had in the American Civil War were that (a) railroads connected at central terminals in cities and (b) they all used the same gauge.

Standard gauge, sure. And I guess railroads may have shared terminals in smaller cities or towns. But in larger cities different railroads did have different passenger terminals.

I don't know about freight terminals or links between the terminals of different lines. Maybe somebody else has more information.

23 posted on 11/10/2012 10:48:18 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: x

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/r/railwidth.htm


24 posted on 11/10/2012 10:50:35 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: x
At least passengers can move themselves from train to train or even terminal to terminal.

Certain large cities were blessed with a multitude of passenger terminals (Chicago once had seven). Of course with most of the stations scattered, this was simply a curse for the passenger connecting through the city on lines with different terminals.

Chicago retains four terminals scattered around the periphery of the Loop, plus Els and subways, and you have to walk (or cab or bus) among them if the Loop is not your destination. There has been (mostly idle) talk in recent decades about a rapid-transit ring connecting the stations, but it's simply going to be too expensive, at least in this cycle of the Universe.

26 posted on 11/10/2012 11:27:22 AM PST by Erasmus (Zwischen des Teufels und des tiefen, blauen Meers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson