Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Popman
Given enough time the EPA will come out with new regs to cut the gauge by 1/2 inch to combat climate change....

No, no matter what RAILROADS are still the most efficient way to move goods. IIRC, A gallon of Diesel can move 5 tons over 200 miles.

16 posted on 11/10/2012 9:13:37 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ExCTCitizen

Yep, pound for pound, rail is the most efficient. On average, it takes about 2.7 to 3.5lbs. of drawbar pull to move 1 ton of train. The average road locomotive is rated at 4400HP, and has about 120,000lb. of drawbar pull. The railroad I work for has an average 9000 ton train, at 10,800ft. length. Aside from the arcane info, does this mean that you can move a locomotive down an old Roman wagon trail?


18 posted on 11/10/2012 10:07:42 AM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: ExCTCitizen
No, no matter what RAILROADS are still the most efficient way to move goods.

If water is available cargo ships beat trains. Maybe robotic blimps would beat them all. Fuel efficiency comparisons never seem to factor in speed differences. If a 747 slowed down to 150 mph and a freight train sped up to that speed, the 747's fuel efficiency would blow the train away. In theory fuel efficiency for all modes of transport approaches infinity as speed approaches zero.

21 posted on 11/10/2012 10:24:43 AM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson