[OneWingedShark]

Candidates need to understand that Roe v. Wade is the Law of the Land (and is highly unlikely to get overturned) and this should be their answer.

Funny, Roe v. Wade derives the right to abortion from a right to privacy... yet the Fourth Amendment specifically is about privacy (people, their persons, and effects) and the government abrogates this privacy, without warrant, every day: it is after all the express job of the TSA. (This is ignoring the arguments from no-knock raids, secret wiretapping & e-mail interception done without warrant.)

So then, if Roe v. Wade is valid then these other actions must be invalid. {If Roe v. Wade is invalid, it says nothing about these actions.}

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

The “Roe v. Wade argument was from Drew68. My argument boiled down to the fact that being legal does not make it right.

When they ram the UN Gun ban down our throats, just like they rammed govt health care, will us pro 2nd Amendment types be be told to “STFU?”