1. Simply don’t know.
2. I believe would have actually helped Romney if it hit in the right area. It hit in an area that was largely irrelevant to the GOP.
3. No. Had nothing to do with it. Chris Christie did what he needed to do for his State. Be that as it may, I do not support Chris Christie for 2016.
4. I didn’t believe the polls either and I had a built in 5% Obama deficit. I guess the Bradley or Dinkins affect doesn’t exist after all.
5. I believe the election was winnable, just not by Romney as I think Romney ran a near tactical perfect campaign.
6. Disagree. It’s really really tough to go head to head on foreign policy against a sitting President. Romney did perfect on debate #3.
7. Rush is great, but I don’t take him for more than he is, a political entertainer.
8. Bingo, Bingo, Bingo. We have a winner here. Stupid candidates sabotaging their own campaigns and muddling the message of Romney.
9. #8 dragged the Senate down along with Romney. The house stayed the same because house seats represent districts and as the red/blue map shows us, there are more red districts than blue.
10. I don’t think fraud really works at the presidential level in general, maybe if it’s close. This wasn’t close. Most fraud is for state and local elections.
#8 is the winner.
“2. I believe would have actually helped Romney if it hit in the right area. It hit in an area that was largely irrelevant to the GOP.”
I won’t respond to all of them, but if it didn’t hurt Romney, why did Romney’s campaign do everything they could to stop Christie - and why did Rush go after Christie the way he did? This one hurt.