From this thread:
- - - - - -
I remember reading a couple FReepers' thoughts following the 3rd debate that their 'sense' was that both R & Ø acted like they knew something had or was about to happen.
They then proceeded to (mainly) sidestep the entire Libyan situation, with much wailing / gnashing of teeth here re Romney's 'missed opportunity' to stick the foreign policy knife in deeply.
And now, as this TREASON is finding the light of day, perhaps the mystery of that debate 'something' becomes clear as well.
Perhaps Mitt figured out, or was advised, to steer well clear of the entire CF and allow the MaggØt to hoist himself on his own traitorous petard ?