“accurate for the past 120 million years”
Statements like this make my eyes roll so far back in my head they get stuck.
The experts can’t even accurately predict what the local weather is going to be tomorrow.
But they can predict yesterday's weather perfectly, and isn't that clear evidence of the validity of their model?
It works like this. I use a mathematical equation to correlate the last 7 days of weather to a 1962 edition of TV Guide. It is 100% accurate, so how could you possibly dismiss its accuracy for predicting tomorrow's weather?
Where could the flaw be in that?