Why are you asking this loaded question?
I agree that science is not a substitute for religion and that scientific dogma (it exists) ought not be used as a holy book. I never made any claims about the Bible; you are the only one that brings up that book (it has some interesting stuff, such as pointing out the earth is spherical and “hangs upon nothing”, but nobody ever claims it is the repository of all scientific knowledge given its focus).
What about religion not being a substitute for science? I ask because you won't say whether you hold religion to the same high standard as you do for science.