Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MileHi
So you find it sloppy to call it the "Russian 30.06"?

Well I do yes. Probably because I take a historical connotation in the description, and the historical link is not there. As I pointed out earlier, one can compare the ballistics of almost all .30-.32 cal medium to long case cartridges and declare them "the same" if a difference of a few hundred fps doesn't bug you. To say they are similar can be useful as a frame of reference. Getting back to the Russians, the Soviets flat out copied many things, like the B-29. Thus, that is what I'm thinking when I hear "Russian .30-06". To a neophyte, I might describe it as a .30 cal rimmed case, with a length between that of an -06 and a .308. But that's just me. Depending on their level of knowledge, I might also say its a shiny thing that goes bang. :-)

47 posted on 09/28/2012 3:46:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan
This is probably the best explanation of why the .30-06 isn't the first thing that pops into my mind when I think 7.62x54R comparisons:
But if a person only knows U.S. hunting cartridges, then using the .308 (closer in size) and .30-06 as references would be a logical comparison for them, for size and performance.



48 posted on 09/28/2012 6:09:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
OK For me, when I hear .06 or 300 mag or .223 I think in terms of performance more so than lineage.
49 posted on 09/28/2012 7:54:59 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson